A replica Bobby Labonte suit from his days with Ask.com in 2009, which has been made by Simpson
What The Hell Was Formula 1 Thinking in Japan?
By David G. Firestone
A few weeks ago, I called out the NHRA for having the Carolina Nationals when the track conditions were unsafe. This week, I’m going to call out Formula 1 and the Suzuka Circut promoters for the same thing. What happened on Sunday was beyond unacceptable, and I’m demanding answers.
To recap what happened, at the time of the start of the race, 3 PM local time, the track was drenched by the very northern part of Typhoon Phanfone, a category 1 storm. It was expected that the storm would miss Suzuka, and so the event was allowed to start, but it quickly became clear that the weather was going to be an issue. The race started under the safety car, ran for 3 laps, and was then red flagged due to weather. After a brief red flag period, the race resumed, again under the safety car for the first 9 laps. The race then went back green, and it seemed that it would go the distance. It should be noted that many teams were focusing on lap 40, or 3/4 of the scheduled distance, since at that point the race would be official. Even NBC mentioned the race to lap 40 on several occasions. Visibility was a serious issue, due to the spray coming off the cars, and there was reduced grip, even with the rain tires on.
Lap 40 came and went, but on lap 42, Adrian Sutil in the #98 Sauber-Ferrari hydroplaned off the track. He could not get his car back on the track and a local yellow flag was shown to drivers to warn them of the situation. A tractor was called to the scene to help remove the crippled car. As this is unfolding, Jules Bianchi lost control of his car on lap 43, and slammed into the tractor. It quickly became clear that he was seriously injured. The safety car was deployed, and the race was red flagged on lap 44. The drivers were very concerned with his condition, and the victory lane celebration was subdued, to say the least. As of this writing, Jules Bianci is in critical condition, but he is breathing on his own.
What I want to know is how a sport that is as safety-focused as Formula 1 is could allow a race to be run in such obviously unsafe conditions. Why is Jules Bianci fighting for his life after a situation that could have been easily avoided? The race should have canceled. The promoters would have had to deal with upset fans, but that would have been a small price to pay compared to what played out.
Formula 1 is very concerned about safety. Their fan base is quick to correctly point out that F1 has not had a driver death on track since 1994. I’m giving credit where credit is due, F1 is very good with safety, but today they dropped the ball, and a talented young driver is fighting for his life, and may never race again. I ask again, why wasn’t the race canceled? Racing is a sport where safety can mean the difference between life and death. For this event to have been held in these conditions is beyond unacceptable!
I’ve been following racing for 24 years, I’ve seen too many talented drivers killed in racing for me to be quiet about this! Safety should always take precedent in auto racing. I’m calling out Charlie Whiting, Bernie Ecclestone, Herbie Blash, anyone directly under them and the promoters of Suzuka Circut in Japan. What happend today is beyond unacceptable, and I want explanations for why the race was allowed to run in these conditons! Why did this have to happen when it could have been easily avoided? Who made the decision to run the race in very unsafe conditions? After today, I really don’t care if Charlie Whiting gets sacked. In fact I would like someone involved to get sacked because the ball was dropped.
Jules Bianci is in my thoughts and prayers, as is his family, and I ask the same of my readers. I really hope this story has a happy ending, and I know you do too. I really hope I don’t have to call out another sanctioning body for something like this, but if it happens I will.
Commemorative Patches…and Why I HATE Them!
Derek Jeter has had his number retired. Several teams this year have various anniversaries they are celebrating. All of them are wearing commemorative patches on their uniforms. Why is this important to The Driver Suit Blog? Because too much salt will ruin the soup. What does that mean, well, I saw that Jeter was wearing a patch to commemorate his upcoming retirement, and, well it got me thinking, and I’d like to talk about this issue, which has been getting on my nerves for a while. Sports uniforms in 2014 are designed to move merchandise, and this is the case in racing. I can’t begin to put the blame for this on NASCAR, so I won’t. But I do think that what happened in 1998 is a perfect example of why it doesn’t really work.
In 1998, NASCAR turned 50. In 1948, Bill France Sr. saw the potential for a unified stock car racing series, so at the Streamline Hotel in Daytona Beach, a series of meetings took place. France was in charge of the National Championship Stock Car Circuit or NCSSC, which was founded in 1947, but when the AAA refused to fund the series, France had to make do. Fonty Flock would win the 1947 NCSSC Championship. In December, the meetings took place at the Streamline, and the Series was supposed to be renamed the National Stock Car Racing Association, or NSCRA, but that name was used by a rival organization, so on December 14, 1947, the name NASCAR or National Association of Stock Car Racing Association. NASCAR itself was founded on February 21, 1948.
On February 15, 1998, almost 50 years to that day, the 1998 racing season began in great style with Dale Earnhardt Sr. winning the Daytona 500. NASCAR as a whole celebrated the anniversary in grand style, with NASCAR’s 50 Greatest Drivers being named, and the sports history was celebrated. For an event like this, you need a good logo for it, so this design was utilized to commemorate the 1998 season.
I vividly remember seeing this patch in Winston Cup Illustrated before the season start, and I can remember thinking “I am going to get so sick of seeing this patch by season’s end.” Well I was sick of it, and that was long before the end of the season. NASCAR smeared this patch on everything. Every NASCAR telecast had this logo. Anything and everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, sold by NASCAR in 1998 had this logo. Not even the iconic Barbie doll was immune from this plague. You couldn’t turn around in 1998 without seeing this logo. NASCAR wanted it that way. They used this logo to sell merchandise. That was the whole line of reasoning. This logo will sell merchandise, yes we are thrilled to be 50, but really they just want to move merch.
Every driver suit had this patch somewhere, as this Ted Musgrave example from that season shows.
Decals would up on helmets as well.
NASCAR used this to move merchandise, but it was so overused in telecasts and car designs, that I intentionally didn’t buy that much NASCAR stuff during that time. I could not wait for the season to end, and I didn’t have to look at that logo again. Sports uniforms as a whole are using more of these patches to sell merchandise, and frankly it’s now completely out of control. Sports jerseys retail about $100 on the low end, and these patches are used to sell more of them. Is a logo like that really worth shelling out $100 for a new jersey, or shirt, or jacket? I’m gonna say no.
After the 1998 season, the logo did go away, but not before another major issue with these types of logos come up. When these logos are being used, merchandise sells. When the season ends, and a new season begins, the logos aren’t selling as much, and the retailers who sell merchandise have a lot of this stuff that they have to put on sale to move it. This is not a small issue for retailers, as many of them are mom and pop stores whose profit margins are razor thin enough. In many instances, these items will be sold at a loss to make room for new merchandise. People will say that these are “collector’s items” but prices on eBay would lead me to believe that this is not the case. They make money for a short time, and lose money in the long term. This has become the case in general with commemorative logos on merchandise.
If this logo had been used on merchandise, but hadn’t been used in the telecasts as much as it was, I would be willing to work with it a bit more, but even in 2014, 16 years after the fact, my hatred for this logo is still with me. Words can’t say how much I hate seeing this logo again. What I’m about to say next might seem odd, but it is the truth…I don’t think it’s a bad logo. In fact, I think it’s a good logo, but I was so sick of seeing it, that I hate it. When you as a fan would watch a 3 hour long race, and had to see this logo in the corner while the race was on, and at every commercial break, it got really old, really fast.
It’s a problem with sports uniforms that’s endemic. It started with anniversaries, and moved on to number retirements, old stadiums closing, new stadiums opening, announcers retiring, players about to retire, and even anniversaries of tragic events. It has gotten out of hand. It moves merchandise in the short term, which is good, but too much salt will ruin the soup every time. Commemorative patches need to be toned down…way down.
Editor’s Note, we are now in October, and now starts the Pinktober, Pinkwashing, call it whatever you want, but for the next month, sports teams across the country will be using pink on uniforms and equipment to raise money for in support of breast cancer. Much of this does not go to serious research, but to more “feel good” charities that don’t really help. Toward that end, all pinkwashing schemes will earn an automatic F. If someone is bold enough to try pinkwashing and camo, it will earn them a one rank loss on the Paint Scheme Leaderboard, and automatic disqualification for the best paint scheme set in the Schemies.
First, we have some 2015 Schemes…
Kasey Kahne #5 Farmers Insurance Chevy SS It has a good color scheme, and while it’s overdesigned, it still looks better than the current scheme. I’ll give it a C+
Ty Dillon #33 Yuengling Brewery Chevy SS I love the faded glory design, I think it works well, and I’ll give it an A+
Now onto the 2014 schemes…
Jamie McMurray #1 McDonald’s Monopoly Chevy SS Overall design is good, I like the color scheme, and it is a great looking car, A+
Michael Annett #7 Cypress Chevy SS Overdesigned and has a goofy color scheme earns an F every time.
Clint Bowyer #15 Five Hour Energy Pink Lemonade Toyota Camry Pinkwashing earns an automatic F.
Ricky Stenhouse Jr. #17 Cargill Beef Ford Fusion I like the black flames on the blue background, but the orange and white stripes take away from it. It kills a great look with a great color scheme, and takes it from an A to a B-
Timmy Hill #32 US Chrome Ford Fusion Great simple design with a great color scheme earns an A+
Josh Wise #98 Vapor Station Ford Fusion Good design, good color scheme, A+
Introduction to Sports Memorabilia-Tom Johansen Firesuit
Pit crew member Tom Johansen was involved with this prototype suit from 2006.
Two For One! Steve Lorenzen and Miss Winston
Gonna do a two for one this week. Two suits this week, in a good mood, gonna spread the love. Our first week is my first Stand 21 suit, a 2000-2001 Toyota Atlantic series suit worn by Steve Lorenzen. The Toyota Atlantic Championship was a racing series in Champ Car that ran from 1977 to 1988 as the Formula Atlantic Championship. It then became part of Champ Car from 1989 to 2005, then it became Champ Car Atlantic from 2006-2007. After than from 2008-2009 it was unaffiliated with any major racing series, and is currently on hiatus.
This particular suit was worn by driver Steve Lorenzen. Lorenzen raced in the Toyota Atlantic Championship from 2000-2001 for 6 races in total. He did not have any success, and left the series after 2001.
The suit shows light use, having been raced for only 6 races, and is FIA certified. The collar has a Stand 21 logo on either side.
A warranty label is present on the inside of the collar in French and English.
The front of the suit has a YOKOHAMA and MCI WORLD COM logo on the right side,
and on the left is a TOYOTA ATLANTIC CHAMPIONSHIP logo,
and nothing except stripes on the torso.
The shoulders have no epaulets,
no logos on the top of the sleeves
and STAND 21 logos on the ends, just below an arm restraint on each sleeve.

The second item is a jump suit worn by Miss Winston in the late 1970’s or early 1980’s.
Miss Winston was an idea thought up in the 1970’s. The idea was to have a beauty queen with the drivers in Victory Lane after races. The idea died after the Winston Cup turned to the Nextel Cup, but when Sprint took over in 2009, the idea was revived. It is a simple red polyester jumpsuit 
with a Winston logo on the chest,
a white belt,
straps on the legs,
and short short sleeves.
Miss Winston was an idea thought up in the 1970’s. The idea was to have a beauty queen with the drivers in Victory Lane after races. The idea died after the Winston Cup turned to the Nextel Cup, but when Sprint took over in 2009, the idea was revived.
Now we move on to…
PAINT SCHEME REVIEWS!
Kasey Kahne #5 Design the 5 Chevy SS This is an awful scheme, even by Kasey Kahne standards. I can’t say anything good about it, so I will just give it an F
Greg Biffle #16 3M/W.B. Mason Ford Fusion Another terrible Greg Biffle scheme, another D grade.
Ryan Newman #31 Quicken Loans Fan Designed Chevy SS Great scheme, I like the black and gray effect, and the color scheme is good, A+
David Ragan #34 Wendell Scott Tribute Ford Fusion There is nothing wrong with this paint scheme. Color and design are perfect and it earns an A+
David Ragan #34 Plimpton Hills Ford Fusion See above, and you know it’s fall when pumpkin chucking ads start popping up. A+
Kurt Busch #41 Haas CNC 500th Start Chevy SS Kurt is starting his 500th race this week at Dover, and to celebrate, he is running a special paint scheme. The color scheme is decent, it has a gray scale look, but it is somewhat overdesigned. I wish Kurt would have a scheme for his 500th start that is better than a C, but that is how the cookie crumbles.
I Love The Tide Ride!
When I did The Paint Schemies last year, I also did a Top 10 list of Sponsors I Miss In NASCAR. Number 7 was Tide detergent. Tide was a major sponsor of NASCAR from the 1980’s to the mid 2000’s. That orange, yellow, white and blue car was distinctive without going too far. The scheme never evolved because it didn’t have to. It was one of the best schemes ever.
Like The Family Channel and Kodiak, I sometimes buy racing stuff because it is from the Tide Ride. Started in 1987, the “Tide Ride” was a staple in the Sprint Cup Series, and was used heavily until 2006, when the sponsorship left PPI Racing, and wasn’t seen in NASCAR since. Some of the most memorable Tide Ride moments were the 1989 Daytona 500 where Darrell Waltrip did the Icky Shuffle in victory lane, the 1997 Brickyard 400 won by Ricky Rudd, and the 2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400 which is tied as the closest race in NASCAR history, won by Ricky Craven over Kurt Busch.
One of my favorite items is a Bobby Hamilton driver suit circa 2004-2005.
This design can be seen in photos from 2004 and 2005, so I’m not exactly sure when it was used. Unlike most suits I have seen, it has the car number on the collar.
It has a white top,
and on the torso logo, there is a yellow and blue stripe in a diagonal arrangement.
On the back of the suit, the Tide logo is on the same place in the front, with the same stripe pattern as the front.
The belt has Bobby Hamilton Jr. on the front
and http://www.ppi-racing.com on the back.
The suit has no TV logos on the sleeves or legs.

Ricky Rudd was Tide’s driver in the 1990’s, and there is a lot of Rudd merchandise. For example, this Simpson mini helmet from the late 1990’s. It is a perfect replica of his late 1990’s helmet, but in a 1/4 scale.
This Ricky Rudd 1/24 scale die-cast from 1998 goes with it…

The last Tide Ride item I have is this 1:87 replica hauler. This was a perfect replica of what Ricky used during his time with Hendrick and was sponsored by Tide.

Now we move on to…
PAINT SCHEME REVIEWS!
Before we start, I have something I need to address, earlier this week, I discussed why I did not like the new paint scheme elements for the Chase drivers. I thought a long time about how I would approach this in the paint scheme grades, and decided that since the drivers were forced into this situation, that I would not hold it against them in the grading rules. So the Chase schemes, unless they are new schemes will not be affected since this was not of their choosing.
We have a couple of 2015 schemes, courtesy of Joe Gibbs Racing
Carl Edwards #19 Stanley/DeWalt Toyota Camry The color scheme is good, the side design could be a little more toned down, and again, I’m taking this with a grain of salt, since there can be design changes before the season starts, but this is a solid B+ design.
Matt Keseth #20 DeWalt/Stanley Toyota Camry…The Killer Bees have returned! Good solid design with a great color scheme earns an A+, and like Carl Edwards above, I’m taking it with a grain of salt.
Now on to the 2014 Schemes…
Jamie McMurray #1 Belkin/WEMO Chevy SS Lime green does not work on a race car. It has a good design scheme but the color scheme is awful! I can’t help but give it a D-
Kevin Harvick #4 Budweiser Designate a Driver Chevy SS Good color scheme, decent design scheme, A
Michael Annett #7 Cypress HQ Chevy SS No. Redeeming. Design. Elements. Whatsoever. F.
Michael Annett #7 Golden Coral/Feed the Children Chevy SS See Above. F.
David Ragan #34 Clean Harbors Ford Fusion Same scheme as The Pete Store, same A+ Grade
David Gilliland #38 Love’s Truck Stops Ford Fusion The only bad thing I can say about this scheme is I don’t like the back bumper design. Other than that, great color scheme and reasonably simple design. Final Grade: B+
David Gilliland #38 Love’s Truck Stops/Jack Czapla Ford Fusion See Above
Justin Allgaier #51 Plan B Sales Chevy SS See Michael Annett above. F
Home Beer Brew Project:Final Update
After two weeks of brewing, and two weeks of carbonation, I finally got to enjoy the fruits of my labor. After work last night, I cracked one of these babies open, and I have to say that it was really good! I will definitive do this again!
What Happened at the Carolina Nationals Yesterday?
By David G. Firestone
Yesterday, I called out NASCAR, today, I’m calling out the NHRA. I’m demanding an explanation for what happened during the Carolina Nationals on Sunday! Here is how I watch racing, I’ll watch a live telecast whenever possible, but I’ll watch the NHRA whenever it’s on ESPN or ESPN2 since I don’t get ESPN3. So after watching NASCAR on Sunday, I sat down to watch the Carolina Nationals Final Eliminations. The first round of top fuel and funny car went well, at least from my perspective. Then, pro stock started their first round, and the Allen Johnson/V Gaines race started, and I’ll let the video speak for itself.
The 67 year old Vieri Gaines was unhurt, but what happened next stunned me. What followed was an hour of discussion between the crews and the NHRA officials concerning track conditions. The wreck itself did damage to the track, but there were problems leading up to that race. The track had been dealing with concrete issues on the racing surface. Allen Johnson was interviewed while the wreck was being cleaned up, and he slammed the NHRA for letting the cars race on the surface. John Force was very upset, and Tony Schumacher called the racing surface “un-race-able.” Obviously the NHRA officials were aware of the fears of the drivers and of the conditions of the track. There were attempts made to solve the issues, but rain and a bad surface caused the cancellation.
I want an explanation, from Z-Max Dragway, the NHRA or someone involved as to how a racing surface can get that bad. Obviously there was a failure somewhere, and something like that happened. How could the NHRA and Z-Max Dragway allow the competitors to race on a surface that was obviously not capable of holding races safely! I normally wait until Saturday to post new blogs, but this needs to be discussed right now!
I’m demanding an explanation, and the NHRA and Z-Max Dragway owe not just me, but all of their drivers, crew members, sponsors and fans an explanation. Many fans left disappointed, fans watching from home were too, and there was no reason for this. Why wasn’t the racing surface safe? Why was concrete lifting off the track? Why in the world was the track sub par? What makes it even worse is that someone high up on the NHRA chain of command made a decision to allow the race to go ahead despite an unsafe racing surface, and I want to know why they would risk driver safety in that respect!
Both groups have a duty to ensure the safety of the competitors and fans, both groups failed horribly in that respect. V Gaines got lucky, and wasn’t seriously hurt, but that could have been a lot different. How could something like this take place in this day in age? Tom Compton, Dallas Gardner, Bruton Smith, you owe everyone involved, drivers, crew members, sponsors and fans an explanation for yesterday’s debacle. What happened was unacceptable, and someone needs to stand up and explain what decisions were made prior to the event, what the officials knew, and why the decisions were made the way they were.
Introduction to Sports Memorabilia-Autograph Collection
A collection of baseball, basketball, football, hockey, auto racing, and other autographed items.
The Chase Design Elemets…Too Much of a Good Thing!
By David G. Firestone
Well the Chase for the NASCAR Sprint Cup has begun. What that means for the 16 drivers in the Chase is special paint scheme rules. Specifically, all Chase drivers will have yellow numbers on the roof, a yellow windshield banner, a yellow front splitter, and special decals. I waited on discussing this issue because I wanted to see how the cars looked on track. While some cars looked good, with the yellow elements working well, other cars looked awful, with the yellow clashing with the current design scheme. No car suffered as much as Brad Keselowski and the Miller Lite Ford. I can live with the yellow roof numbers, it has been done before, the and I can live with the windshield banners and decals, I’ll comment on that later, the splitter design is pointless and it makes the car look ugly. Why in the world did NASCAR make the splitter yellow? It serves no purpose, and clashes with the rest of the paint scheme.
Now I wanted to comment on something I noticed that NASCAR is doing. I was worried about this and these fears are now coming true. When the windshield banner was introduced with the Gen 6 cars in 2013, I did not like it. I thought it was pointless, and it didn’t add to the car at all. What I was worried about, but I didn’t discuss it was what else NASCAR had planned for the banner. Well we found out this year. In addition to the plain black, there have been green designs for environmental awareness, patriotic designs for memorial day and the 4th of July, and of course the yellow Chase designs. NASCAR is using this as their vehicle for promoting causes. Like pink bats on Mother’s Day, or patriotic jerseys for Memorial Day in baseball. October is around the corner, and the Pink-washing will begin in earnest, and I’ll be shocked if there aren’t pink banners on the windshields.
I noticed something else when it comes to banners. There are two decals that cars carry, one is the Sprint Cup Series decal, and above that is a NASCAR Race Car decal. When the windshield banner is a special design, the NASCAR decal is a matching design. Let’s look at that Brad Keselowski Memorial Day scheme again. Notice the decal just above the Sprint Cup Series decal? It is a star with NASCAR written on it. Now let’s look at Brad’s car from the Brickyard 400. The NASCAR decal is a simpler, more plain design. This is Kevin Harvick’s car with the green banner. Notice the NASCAR decal…it matches the banner. Why is this important for the Chase schemes? Well because whoever came up with this idea felt the need to give the Chase drivers special NASCAR decals. 16 drivers get yellow decals, the rest get silver. I’m reminded of the Star-bellied Sneetches in this situation…the second time that reference has been made in regard to sports uniforms this year.
I’m really wondering how much more NASCAR can over-complicate this, I really am. Why not add yellow wheels and yellow spoilers? I’m amazed that NASCAR could mess this up they way they did. Get rid of the yellow spoilers and NASCAR decals, and I wouldn’t have a problem with it, but too much salt spoils the soup…every time.
The SCCA Set
I’ve been getting off track(pun intended) lately, and I’m gonna get back to basics. I’ve been wanting to do an article on a set like this for a while. I bought a set of items used by one driver at the same time, namely a driver suit, driving gloves, shoes, goggles, and arm restraints worn at the same time by a driver by the name of Jim Jones, an SCCA racer in the late 1970’s through the late 1980s. He was a weekend warrior who raced for the love of racing. In the late 1980’s he raced a Pontiac Trans Am and was sponsored by Boston-based Nimrod Press.
The first and most prominent item is this driver suit. It was worn by Jones in the 1980’s, and is black with red safety stripes and a quilt pattern.
The suit shows a nice amount of wear. There are a number of small sponsor patches on the chest and it has a blood type indication sewn into the suit under the number.
This is so that in the event of a very severe accident, the hospital can know quickly what blood type Jones is and get him a transfusion. You also often see this on motorcycle helmets. The shoulders have safety straps, the sleeves have safety stripes in red, and the old school SIMPSON RACE PRODUCTS patch on the sleeve.
The belt,
legs,
and back
have no decoration to speak of. There is a small tear just above the belt.
The second item is a pair of Worth racing gloves.
The gloves show a large amount of wear, with the Worth racing logo damaged on both gloves, and the padding on the gloves is highly soiled.

The third item is a pair of Simpson racing shoes,
which show a decent amount of wear. I love the fact that the inside of the shoes is neon yellow, whereas the outside of the shoes are all black.

The third and fourth items are pairs of goggles. The first is a French pair of Bolle goggles, which show a decent amount of wear.
The second pair is an Italian pair of Carerra goggles, which also show a large amount of wear.
These were from a time when drivers wore helmets that mandated goggles. Even full-faced helmets needed goggles.
The last item is a pair of arm restraints. Many racing series mandate these to prevent arm injuries that occur from crashes when the drivers are in restricted driver cockpit. This particular pair of restraints were made by Auto Pro, and show a decent amount of use.

Now we move on to…
TAILGATING TIME!
This week, I’m gonna share my recipe for Dave’s Nitro Burning Ribs. These ribs are easy to prepare and have a unique sauce. I like to use a Siracha Stout barbeque sauce for my ribs. So, without further ado, the rib recipe!
INGREDIENTS:
For the ribs:
1 tablespoon cumin
1 tablespoon paprika
1 tablespoon granulated garlic
1 tablespoon granulated onion
1 tablespoon chili powder
1 tablespoon brown sugar
2 tablespoons kosher salt
1 teaspoon cayenne pepper
1 teaspoon black pepper
1 teaspoon white pepper
3 racks baby back ribs, about 5 pounds
For the barbecue sauce:
2 tbs olive oil
8 cloves of garlic, minced
2/3 cup low sodium soy sauce
1 1/3 cup ketchup
4 tbs worcestershire sauce
3 tsp sriracha
4 tsp smoked paprika
2 cup Stout
2/3 cup brown sugar
2 tsp onion powder
DIRECTIONS:
1. Mix together the cumin, garlic, granulated onion, cayenne pepper, brown sugar, paprika, chili powder, white pepper, salt, and black pepper. Rub the spice mixture over both sides of the ribs. Wrap in plastic and refrigerate overnight.
2. Preheat the oven to 325°F. Unwrap the ribs and place them on a baking sheet. Cover completely with foil. Bake for 1 hour and 10 minutes. Remove the foil and let the ribs cool. Refrigerate them, wrapped in plastic, until you are ready to pack, up to 24 hours.
3. While the ribs are cooking, it’s time to make the sauce. In a pot over medium heat, add the oil and allow to get hot but not smoking. Add the garlic and stir until you can smell it, about 30 seconds. Add the remaining ingredients and stir until combined. Allow to cook until thickened, stirring occasionally, about 15 minutes. Store in an air tight container in the fridge. Until you are ready to leave.
4. Just before leaving, Place the racks in a large, seal-able plastic container. Add 1 cup of the barbecue sauce and stir so all the ribs are coated.
5. At the track, Prepare the coals. When the coals are hot, grill the ribs for 10 minutes, until they are lightly charred and heated through, turning them several times and applying several more coatings of sauce.
Serve the ribs hot, accompanied by more sauce.


