Two Baffling News Stories This Week

By David G. Firestone

Back again this week, got a few stories to talk about, so without further ado, let’s get started.

Our first story centers around a couple little details about the new NASCAR Cup Series charter deal. Apparently, as part of this deal, according to Jayski:

“Fox Sports’ Bob Pockrass confirmed Friday that the new charter agreement limits teams to three charters going forward.

Teams with four charters – Hendrick Motorsports and Joe Gibbs Racing – are grandfathered in and can continue to run four chartered cars.

Those teams that operate with three charters can enter a fourth car in races and run it as an open team.”

It was also revealed that Front Row Motorsports had finalized a purchase of one of Stewart-Haas Racing’s charters, which came about as part of a court order in the anti-trust lawsuits. Noah Gragson will be driving the #4.

Is it just me, or has the charter system caused more issues than it fixed? Again, look at all the chartered teams that have gone bust since its inception. Look at how none of the teams are profitable right now. When HENDRICK MOTORSPORTS can’t make a dime of profit for years, you think the smaller teams can?

While I get the idea of cost-cutting, at some point you just have to look at all the damage this system has done, and look at all the issues it’s caused, and realize it has failed. The charter system is not sustainable, it never was. NASCAR needs to assess its options, and work with the Race Team Alliance to come up with something better. The original system wasn’t great, the negotiations and their end were a disaster. This new version isn’t much better.

NASCAR and their teams need to realize the survival of the sport is at stake, and with this bullshit streaming deal starting in 2025, that survival is even less stable. The NASCAR Cup Series has six races on Amazon Prime. They lose an average of 1.2 million viewers from broadcast to cable. I can’t fathom how many users Amazon Prime will hemorrhage, including THE COCA COLA 600! How anyone thought this will work is mind-boggling!

Speaking of mind boggling, let’s talk Rick Ware Racing. Rick Ware Racing is a punching bag for NASCAR fans, and justifiably so. Between the length of time and number of teams they fielded, four cars at one time, to their TOTAL lack of on-track success. Rick Ware Racing has proven themselves as a joke.

But for a while in 2024, thing seemed to be looking up. They snagged Corey LaJoie from Spire Motorsports, as well as having Zane Smith as well. It actually seemed like they finally started to make the right moves, and start moving forward. It was really nice while it lasted. Not only did they lose Zane Smith to Front Row Motorsports, but they cut Corey LaJoie from the team as well. Now, while they only have a single-chartered car, the #51, they will run the #15 part time. So, who did they get to replace Corey LaJoie? Well, according to Fox Sports’ Bob Pockrass…CODY FUCKING WARE!

WHY?!? Who in their right mind would replace Corey LaJoie with Cody Ware? Why would you replace Corey LaJoie with Cody Ware? Who, outside of Rick Ware, thought this was a good idea? How out of touch with racing is Rick Ware to replace Corey LaJoie with his son? Cody has done nothing, and I mean NOTHING in his life, let along his career, to justify a full-time Cup Series ride! Corey LaJoie was the best and most obvious choice to race full-time, and they just blew that up!

Is this real? Is this reality? How in the name of all that is good do you give CODY WARE a full-time ride over COREY FREAKIN’ LAJOIE? I’m struggling to comprehend the logic here! I really am! I get you want the best for your son, but sometimes, you just have to cut your losses! Which is more important, your son’s career, or Rick Ware Racing as an organization? I ask that seriously, because they are on the verge of losing their charters for lack of performance, and this doesn’t do them any favors! SERIOUSLY, WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?

This whole thing is almost like being a Chicago Bears fan! I say almost, because the Bears just beat the Packers since the first time since 2018! Even the Shad and Tony Khan Jacksonville Jaguars can win four games in a season! Even the worst teams can find some success sometimes. Rick Ware Racing has NEVER found success, 10 years after they should have stopped trying! At this point, I predict within the next three years, Rick Ware Racing will either go bust, lose their charters, or sell their charters. There is no other option! At this point, Rick Ware should focus his attention on Clay Millican’s Top Fuel dragster in the NHRA, since Millican can, not only win, but win multiple races in the same season! Clay Millican is Rick Ware’s best option, and I’m willing to bet he will mess that up too!

With that, I can’t rant anymore so, I’ll just call things here. I’ll be back next week.

Sources Cited:

The First News Stories of 2025!

By David G. Firestone

So I’m back from winter break. Santa dropped a new laptop and some parking meters down the chimney this year. I’ve been following a few stories, and I’m going to discuss them. Since the various filings about the NASCAR anti-trust are in legal terms, which are hogwash to me, I’ll hold off on talking about them until later.

Let’s talk about IndyCar, specifically the race at Thermal. The 2024 edition was a shit show, and that’s putting it nicely. The prize money didn’t materialize as hoped, so it was only a $500,000 race as opposed to a $1 million race. Ticket sales were abysmal, due to high ticket prices, and general apathy about IndyCar. The race itself didn’t go over well, with teams, drivers, sponsors, and fans all talking about how bad it was

So you are IndyCar, and you are planning a new season for 2025. You have a deal with Thermal for a 2025 race, what do you do? Well, IndyCar literally didn’t learn a single lesson, and is planning the same event, but in a different year. At the time of writing, it’s back to a $1 million race, no points, just money.

What the fuck? Last year’s event was a certified dud. Nobody liked it. It simply didn’t work. If at first you don’t succeed…WHY? WHY AGAIN? Sure, it failed in every way it could, and yet doing the exact same race in 2025 will somehow yield different results…how does that work?

I’m going to give IndyCar an idea that could save the race. This could be a million dollar idea. Here goes: Take the Thermal race, make it an all-star race, and gimmick the hell out of it. It goes something like this: Every driver who won a race in 2024, and all former champions are locked in. The drivers on the outside will race in a series of heat races, and the winners get into the main event. Qualifying is also done through heat races. The races are a series of races, with new tires and fuel added at the end of each stage.

Sound familiar? This is how the Busch Clash and All-Star races are held in NASCAR. Every all-star game is a gimmick at this point, so why shouldn’t IndyCar follow suit? The marketing writes itself: “The best of the best in IndyCar racing at the most exclusive race track in the United States with a million dollars up for grabs.” Seriously, that would work wonders to get people in the door, and watching on TV?

When Roger Penske took over IndyCar, lots of people, myself included, were optimistic that IndyCar would change for the better. Sadly, it’s become clear that this is another case of “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.” IndyCar continues to stagnate, and, unless some new things are tried, it will continue to stagnate. Sadly, I fail to see any change on the horizon, and I hold out little hope.

Now we move on to wrestling, because a couple of things happened while I was away. First off, WWE revived Saturday Night’s Main Event. The big theme with this version is nostalgia. It was meant to bring back memories of some of the best events of year’s past. It sounds cool on the outside, but it does raise some issues.

First off, nostalgia in sports is a double-edged sword. I’m not saying that it’s truly a bad thing, but in sports where their best years are behind them, all it does is to bring back memories of how much better things were. NASCAR has had this problem for years. They aren’t good at marketing and making stars, so throwbacks and nostalgia serves to remind fans how good things to be.

Pro wrestling is even worse. Wrestling constantly moves forward, not backward. What was good in 1984, and 1994, doesn’t really fly as well in 2024. But the other issue is much more prevalent in 2024.

Wrestling is coming to terms with the fact that many of the wrestlers were very problematic, be it behind the scenes, or after their careers ended. For example, this most recent Saturday’s Night Main Event featured Jessie “The Body” Ventura. Ventura is a notable personality, and was the governor of Minnesota. He is also a right-wing crackpot conspiracy theorist.

Of the other commentators, most are dead, or are so problematic that WWE can’t bring them back. Hulk Hogan is so problematic, WWE can’t bring him back, as is the case with Vince McMahon. It’s amazing how awful these legends are. This is not limited to WWE, as even wrestlers who weren’t in WWE are now being seen as the horrible people that they are.

WWE didn’t do themselves any favors, given all the lawsuits they are currently facing due to actions of their staff and leadership. Focusing on the present is a much better strategy than focusing on the past, as far as wrestling is concerned.

Now we move on to a big wrestling story, this one from TNA Wrestling. At Final Resolution at Center Stage in Atlanta, The System, a team consisting of Brian Myers and Eddie Edwards, faced The Hardys, Matt and Jeff for the TNA World Tag Team Championship, with the Hardys retaining the championship.

During the event, an incident between Edwards and a fan occurred. I will take this description of the event from Cageside Seats:

“Edwards competed alongside Brian Myers in a tables match against the Hardys at Final Resolution (Dec. 13, 2024). The crowd was hostile toward the System and vocalized several chants with curse words. One fan in particular must have muttered something uncouth, then he flipped the bird. Edwards took exception and knocked the fan’s beverage out of his hand. The fan reacted with a slap across the cheek. Edwards retaliated with a much crisper slap to the face. Officials intervened to make sure the incident didn’t go any further, and security escorted the fan out of the building.

This fan didn’t appear to be a plant for story-line purposes. After the knucklehead move, the fan didn’t put up any resistance in his forced departure from ringside. Edwards brushed it off and carried on with the match.”

Look, I get that heels are supposed to get heat with the crowd. I get that heels should be seen as the evil bad guys. However, under no circumstances should the heel physically confront a fan unless in self-defense. If a fan jumps the rail, then the wrestler can defend themselves. In this case, words being exchanged is NOT a reason for either party to slap the other.

This could have severe repercussions for TNA. Lawsuits could be filed against Eddie Edwards, TNA, and more critically, the venue. Venues do NOT like having to deal with lawsuits from fans over incidents like this, and I’m willing to bet that this will cause issues with TNA and Center Stage.

I’m not defending Edwards, and I’m not defending the fan, both parties are equally guilty. I’m saying that this whole thing was handled badly by everyone involved. You are allowed to cheer and boo as you please, but do NOT physically involve yourself with the wrestlers, you will get arrested, and may get beaten. Alternatively, any wrestler who physically assaults a fan could open the door to a lot of legal issues. It’s just not worth it.

This has been an issue in wrestling for decades, and recent events are compounding the issue. I really don’t agree with any attack, but stupid people do stupid shit.

With that, I finish this week’s episode, and I will continue with news stories next week.

Sources Cited:

https://www.cagesideseats.com/2024/12/14/24320992/eddie-edwards-slaps-fan-incident-tna-final-resolution-2024-kicked-out-local-police-no-script-reacts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Resolution_(2024)

2024 Paint Scheme Leaderboard Part 4-The Grand Finale

By David G. Firestone

1-#50 Team AmeriVet Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 2

GPA: 4.00

2-#50 23XI Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 4th of 45

Number of Schemes: 1

GPA: 4.00

3-#8 Richard Childress Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 11th of 45

Number of Schemes: 13

GPA: 3.95

4-#78 Live Fast Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 37th of 45

Number of Schemes: 3

GPA: 3.76

5-#44 NY Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 9

GPA: 3.74

6-#36 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 8th of 45

Number of Schemes: 1

GPA: 3.70

7-#9 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 1st of 45

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 3.67

8-#12 Team Penske Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 10th of 45

Number of Schemes: 21

GPA: 3.67

9-#15 Rick Ware Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 24th of 45

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 3.65

10-#60 RFK Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: N/A of 45

Number of Schemes: 3.65

GPA: 2

11-#5 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 6th of 45

Number of Schemes: 5

GPA: 3.60

12-#31 Kaulig Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 31st of 45

Number of Schemes: 8

GPA: 3.55

13-#2 Team Penske Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 12th of 45

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 3.55

14-#13 Kaulig Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 25th of 45

Number of Schemes: 5

GPA: 3.52

15-#22 Team Penske Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 7th of 45

Number of Schemes: 14

GPA: 3.50

16-#24 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 20th of 45

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 3.42

17-#14 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 26th of 45

Number of Schemes: 14

GPA: 3.41

18-#6 RFK Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 23rd of 45

Number of Schemes: 7

GPA: 3.36

19-#11 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 13th of 45

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 3.34

20-#3 Richard Childress Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 22nd of 45

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 3.20

21-#21 Wood Brothers Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 17th of 45

Number of Schemes: 9

GPA: 3.14

22-#51 Rick Ware Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 5th of 45

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 3.14

23-#41 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 15th of 45

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 3.11

24-#17 RFK Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 16th of 45

Number of Schemes: 9

GPA: 3.03

25-#84 Legacy Motor Club Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 33rd of 45

Number of Schemes: 6

GPA: 2.95

26-#23 23XI Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 34th of 45

Number of Schemes: 21

GPA: 2.95

27-#10 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 9th of 45

Number of Schemes: 2.87

GPA: 13

28-#66 MBM Motorsports Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 10

GPA: 2.83

29-#45 23XI Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 35th of 45

Number of Schemes: 16

GPA: 2.81

30-#47 JTG Daugherty Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 30th of 45

Number of Schemes: 34

GPA: 2.76

31-#38 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 21st of 45

Number of Schemes: 21

GPA: 2.72

32-#43 Legacy Motor Club Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 29th of 45

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 2.67

33-#7 Spire Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 26th of 45

Number of Schemes: 14

GPA: 2.62

34-#34 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 19th of 45

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 2.61

35-#42 Legacy Motor Club Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 32nd of 45

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 2.60

36-#4 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 27th of 45

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 2.45

37-#16 Kaulig Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 16th of 45

Number of Schemes: 24

GPA: 2.50

38-#1 Trackhouse Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 39th of 45

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 2.22

39-#99 Trackhouse Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 42nd of 45

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 2.22

40-#71 Spire Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 8

GPA: 2.21

41-#20 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 38th of 45

Number of Schemes: 13

GPA: 2.21

42-#19 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 28th of 45

Number of Schemes: 9

GPA: 2.19

43-#62 Beard Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 41st of 45

Number of Schemes: 2

GPA: 2.00

44-#33 Richard Childress Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 3rd of 45

Number of Schemes: 4

GPA 1.93

45-#77 Spire Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 43rd of 45

Number of Schemes: 11

GPA: 1.88

46-#48 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 45th of 45

Number of Schemes: 7

GPA: 1.42

47-#54 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 14th of 45

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 1.33

Next Week, Wheel Reviews begins!

2024 Paint Scheme Leaderboard Part 3-Toyota

By David G. Firestone

1-#50 23XI Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 1

GPA: 4.00

2-#11 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 1st of 7

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 3.34

3-#84 Legacy Motor Club Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: N/A of 7

Number of Schemes: 6

GPA: 2.95

4-#23 23XI Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 4th of 7

Number of Schemes: 21

GPA: 2.95

5-#45 23XI Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 5th of 7

Number of Schemes: 16

GPA: 2.81

6-#43 Legacy Motor Club Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 2.67

7-#42 Legacy Motor Club Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 2.60

8-#20 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 5th of 7

Number of Schemes: 13

GPA: 2.21

9-#19 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 3rd of 7

Number of Schemes: 9

GPA: 2.19

10-#54 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Rank Last Year: 2nd of 7

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 1.33

Next Week, The Final 2024 Paint Scheme Leaderboard.

2024 Paint Scheme Leaderboard Part 2-Ford

By David G. Firestone

1-#36 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 4th of 16

Number of Schemes: 1

GPA: 3.70

2#12 Team Penske Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 6th of 16

Number of Schemes: 21

GPA: 3.67

3-#60 RFK Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 2

GPA: 3.65

4-#15 Rick Ware Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 14th of 16

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 3.65

5-#2 Team Penske Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 7th of 16

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 3.55

6#22 Team Penske Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 3rd of 16

Number of Schemes: 14

GPA: 3.50

7-#14 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 15th of 16

Number of Schemes: 14

GPA: 3.41

8-#6 RFK Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 13th of 16

Number of Schemes: 7

GPA: 3.36

9-#21 Wood Brothers Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 10th of 16

Number of Schemes: 9

GPA: 3.14

10-#51 Rick Ware Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 2nd of 16

Number of Schemes: 16

GPA: 3.14

11-#41 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 8th of 16

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 3.11

12-#17 RFK Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 9th of 16

Number of Schemes: 9

GPA: 3.03

13-#10 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 5th of 16

Number of Schemes: 2.87

GPA: 13

14-#66 MBM Motorsports Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 10

GPA: 2.83

15-#38 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 12th of 16

Number of Schemes: 21

GPA: 2.72

16-#34 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 11th of 16

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 2.61

16-#4 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

Rank Last Year: 16th of 16

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 2.16

Next Week, The Toyota leaderboard.

2024 Paint Scheme Leaderboard Part 1-Chevy

By David G. Firestone

1-#50 Team AmeriVet Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 2

GPA: 4.00

2-#8 Richard Childress Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 5th of 22

Number of Schemes: 13

GPA: 3.95

3-#78 Live Fast Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 16th of 22

Number of Schemes: 3

GPA: 3.76

4-#44 NY Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 9

GPA: 3.74

5-#9 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 1st of 22

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 3.67

6-#5 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 4th of 22

Number of Schemes: 5

GPA: 3.60

7-#31 Kaulig Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 12th of 22

Number of Schemes: 8

GPA: 3.55

8-#13 Kaulig Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 9th of 22

Number of Schemes: 5

GPA: 3.52

9-#24 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 7th of 22

Number of Schemes: 12

GPA: 3.42

10-#3 Richard Childress Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 8th of 22

Number of Schemes: 15

GPA: 3.22

11-#47 JTG Daugherty Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 11th of 22

Number of Schemes: 34

GPA: 2.76

12-#7 Spire Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 15th of 22

Number of Schemes: 14

GPA: 2.62

13-#16 Kaulig Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 6th of 22

Number of Schemes: 24

GPA: 2.50

14-#1 Trackhouse Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 17th of 22

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 2.22

15-#99 Trackhouse Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 19th of 22

Number of Schemes: 17

GPA: 2.22

16-#71 Spire Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: N/A

Number of Schemes: 8

GPA: 2.21

17-#62 Beard Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 18th of 22

Number of Schemes: 2

GPA: 2.00

18-#33 Richard Childress Racing Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 2nd of 22

Number of Schemes: 4

GPA 1.93

19-#77 Spire Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 22th of 22

Number of Schemes: 11

GPA: 1.88

22-#48 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

Rank Last Year: 22nd of 22

Number of Schemes: 7

GPA: 1.42

Next Week: The Ford Leaderboard.

Ladies and Gentlemen…THE 2024 Paint Scheme Awards!

By David G. Firestone

Well, it’s that time again! We have the annual Paint Scheme Awards for the 2024 season. As per the usual, every year, I pick the best and worst paint schemes and award them the Paint Scheme. This was done using the Driver Suit Blog executive committee for paint scheme analysis and consists of me and Driver Suit Blog assistant, my cat Zoe, and uses the following standards:

*Color Scheme:How the colors look, and how they work with each other.

*Overall Design:How good the design itself looks, is there too much, or not enough.

*Primary Sponsor Logos: How the primary sponsor logos look on the car

*Originality: How original is the scheme.

All of the above can work for or against a scheme, and all will be taken into consideration.

Let’s get the bad Paint Scheme Awards out of the way…

First, the Paint Scheme Award for Worst Regular Season Single Paint Scheme.

The nominees are:

The 2024 Paint Scheme Award for Worst Regular Season Single Paint Scheme goes to:

Ross Chastain #1 Worldwide Express Chevy Camaro

Josh Berry #4 Panini/Caitlin Clark Ford Mustang

Corey LaJoie #7 Gainbridge Chevy Camaro

Denny Hamlin #11 Interstate Batteries Toyota Camry

Chris Buescher #17 Fifth-Third Bank Ford Mustang

Tyler Reddick #45 Draft Kings Network Toyota Camry

Tyler Reddick #45 Jordan Brand Toyota Camry

Alex Bowman #48 Ally Financial Chevy Camaro

Justin Haley #51 Pinnacle Home Improvement Ford Mustang

The 2023 Paint Scheme Award for Worst Exhibition or Throwback Paint Scheme goes to…

Denny Hamlin #11 Interstate Batteries Toyota Camry

The next Paint Scheme Award is for Exhibition or Throwback Paint Schemes. This category is a little different, as the Scheme will go to the best and worst throwback. For this category, all exhibition race and throwback paint schemes qualify automatically.

The 2024 Paint Scheme Award for Worst Exhibition or Throwback Paint Scheme goes to…

Bubba Wallace #23 Alltroo Toyota Camry

The next award of 2024 is the Paint Scheme for Worst Paint Scheme Set of 2024. This is based on the total GPA of the individual grades for paint schemes. The nominees are:

#4 Stewart-Haas Racing Ford Mustang

#19 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

#20 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

#33 Richard Childress Racing Chevy Camaro

#34 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

#38 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

#48 Hendrick Motorsports Chevy Camaro

#54 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

#77 Spire Motorsports Chevy Camaro

The 2024 Paint Scheme Award for for Worst Paint Scheme Set goes to…

#54 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

Now after talking about the bad, we discuss the good. Here are the winners in the best category…

First, the Paint Scheme Award for Best Regular Season Single Paint Scheme.

The nominees for the 2024 Paint Scheme Award for for Best Regular Season Single Paint Scheme are:

Austin Dillon #3 Dow/Rivers Are Life/Ducks Unlimited Chevy Camaro

Kyle Larson #5 Hendrickcars.com Chevy Camaro

Brad Keselowski #6 Castrol Ford Mustang

Denny Hamlin #11 Mavis Brakes Plus Toyota Camry

Ryan Blaney #12 Menard’s/Duracel Ford Mustang

Martin Truex Jr. #19 Auto-Owners Insurance Toyota Camry

Harrison Burton #21 Motorcraft/Quick Lane Ford Mustang

Bubba Wallace #23 U.S. Air Force Toyota Camry

William Byron #24 Axalta Chevy Camaro

The 2024 Paint Scheme Award for for Best Regular Season Single Paint Scheme goes to…

Martin Truex Jr. #19 Auto-Owners Insurance Toyota Camry

The next category is Paint Scheme Award is for Best Exhibition or Throwback Paint Schemes, and it should come as no surprise that the competition was strong this year.

The 2024 winner for best throwback is:

Kyle Larson #5 Hendrickcars.com Throwback Chevy Camaro

The final award of 2024 is the Paint Scheme for Best Paint Scheme Set. Like the Worst Set, this is based on the total GPA of the individual grades for paint schemes. The nominees are:

#8 Richard Childress Racing Chevy Camaro

#11 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Camry

#12 Team Penske Ford Mustang

#15 Rick Ware Racing Ford Mustang

#36 Front Row Motorsports Ford Mustang

#50 Team AmeriVet Chevy Camaro

#50 23XI Racing Toyota Camry

#78 Live Fast Motorsports Chevy Camaro

#84 Legacy Motor Club Toyota Camry

The 2024 Paint Scheme Award for for Best Paint Scheme Set goes to…

#50 Team AmeriVet Chevy Camaro

That’s it for the Schemes, next week, the Paint Scheme Leaderboard begins with Chevy!

My Thoughts On The NASCAR Anti-Trust Lawsuit

By David G. Firestone

I’ve been thinking about the NASCAR anti-trust lawsuit. The question that’s come before this whole thing is “Is NASCAR a monopoly?” Well, the obvious answer is yes, it clearly is. But the bigger question that should be discussed is “is that a bad thing?” From where I sit, I say that it isn’t. Now before you light your torches and gather your pitchforks, just hear me out.

Let’s say we are living in an alternative timeline where stock car racing exists , but NASCAR never gets founded. What would happen? Either another sanctioning body becomes what NASCAR currently is, or something like the National Wrestling Alliance forms, but instead of wrestling territories, it oversees regional stock car groups. In either event, both entities would be critical to the sport’s survival.

One of the big issues that NASCAR has and is dealing with are bad racing promoters. Guys and gals who will promise stock car racing to make a quick buck off the fans, and then disappear with the cash. This was one of the reasons NASCAR was a necessary evil. Before regulation, there were a lot of promoters and track owners who were seedy to the umpteenth degree, and NASCAR rooted them out. This is also the case for teams, drivers, owners, sponsors, and various other things related to the sport.

Is NASCAR perfect in this respect? Absolutely not. However, it has done a good enough job to keep the bad elements out and keep the sport legitimate. It’s the same no matter what sport you are talking about. Say what you want about the NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB or whoever, at the end of the day, they are all tasked with keeping the sport in line, the good elements in, and the bad elements out. Sometimes individuals might get thrown under the bus, but that happens in every industry.

At the end of the day, it’s NASCAR’s sandbox. You might want to play, but they own the box, and they own the sand. If you think you know better, go ahead and try, but it probably won’t work. NASCAR will always put the product over the teams should the situation warrant, and sometimes that won’t work out well for some.

Now, when it gets to 23XI and Front Row, they need to consider this: Did you really, after everything that happened, think you could possibly force NASCAR to capitulate to better terms? How? How did you think this would go? There were years of fruitless negotiations between NASCAR and the teams, and the final deal was the best you could get. The fact that two teams had the idea that they could force NASCAR to renegotiate the contract after everyone else fell in line is baffling. This was not a good situation, but two teams trying and failing to get blood from a stone is just moronic.

I have no idea when it became the individual employee over the company, but it is not a smart idea. The overwhelming majority of employees in companies are expendable. If a company can fire the CEO, you honestly think you aren’t getting sacked? I can get sacked at any time. I’m replaceable, you’re replaceable, we all are! If KFC can survive without Harland Sanders, you think you are secure? NASCAR existed long before Front Row Motorsports and 23XI Racing existed. They aren’t as critical to the existence of NASCAR as they think, and if they go under, they will be replaced. Sometimes, you just have to cut your losses, suck it up, and sign the deal.

Another detail that has come to light is that, as part of the proceedings, sponsors can leave the teams. Well, this is another aspect where Front Row and 23XI should be worried. This isn’t 1996 anymore. Sponsors aren’t as loyal as they once were. If they feel like they won’t get the exposure, a better option is available, and they can leave, they will. This is compounded by the fact that, as I’ve discussed, sponsorship money isn’t as plentiful as it once was. If I am an employee of Front Row, or 23XI, I’m thinking positive, but getting my resume ready…it might come in handy sooner rather than later.

All in all, this whole situation is a mess, and I don’t think that the teams will come out on top here. If that’s the case, than they will join the ever growing list of defunct teams in NASCAR. It sucks, but life is unfair, and the sooner you accept it, the better.

With that, I’m done, and now we’re going to switch to the Paint Scheme Awards for next week.

Catching Up On NASCAR News

By David G. Firestone

So I’m back this week, this time with NASCAR news to catch up on. I would have discussed the ending to the Martinsville race, but with everything that happened between then and now, I just didn’t have the energy. I will discuss my thoughts a little later in this column. Anyway, on to NASCAR news.

Our first two stores are about Bobby Allison. The first is the announcement made on October 23, when a decision was made about the NASCAR Cup Series Myers Brothers Memorial at Bowman Gray Stadium on August 6, 1971. To understand the circumstances behind this race, I quote Wikipedia:

“Because of reduced sponsorship money being given out by the “Big Three” automobile companies in Detroit, NASCAR decided to hold six of their smaller Winston Cup Series races in conjunction with the “minor league” NASCAR Grand American Series.

As Bobby Allison was not racing in a Grand National car, he never received credit in that series but was credited with a Grand American Series (“pony” cars) win. Vehicles that competed at the Grand American series were in Chevrolet Camaros, Ford Mustangs and AMC Javelins as opposed to their full-sized equivalents from their manufacturers.[8] NASCAR rules for combination races, which were in effect for Riverside and other West Coast races where the West Series raced with the Cup Series, and later used by other multiple-division races in NASCAR, state each division is scored separately, similar to rules used in the NASCAR-owned International Motor Sports Association sports car racing series. Under current rules, Richard Petty would be credited with a Grand National Series win.”

Well the decision was made to give Bobby Allison the win, 53 years later. According to NASCAR.com:

“NASCAR today announced its recognition of Bobby Allison as the official winner of the NASCAR Cup Series Myers Brothers Memorial at Bowman Gray Stadium on August 6, 1971. The NASCAR record books have been updated to reflect Allison in sole possession of fourth place on the all-time Cup Series wins list with 85 wins.

“For 53 years, the Myers Brothers Memorial was the only race run by NASCAR that did not have an official winner,” said Jim France, NASCAR chairman and CEO. “As we began preparations for the upcoming Clash at Bowman Gray Stadium, the topic of that August 6, 1971 race returned to the forefront. We felt it was the right thing to officially recognize Bobby’s win and honor him as an 85-time NASCAR Cup Series winner. We are grateful for Bobby’s lifetime contributions to NASCAR.”

The timing of this would turn out to be perfect, since, on November 9th, Bobby Allison would die at the age 86. Obviously, the loss of a legend hit the series and the fans very hard. For me, it’s kind of tough to swallow for many reasons. The older I get, the more pass away. It’s hard accepting the fact that you are mortal, but we all have to.

Our next two stores focus on sponsors ending their sponsorships of NASCAR. At the end of the 2020 season, GEICO ended their part of the NASCAR Cup Series premier sponsorship. According to Sports Business Journal, the deal was GEICO paying low seven figures. A change in the marketing strategy and departments was cited for the end.

GEICO really isn’t a big loss. Even with the amount they were paying, they weren’t really interested in promoting the sport. They really weren’t interested in using NASCAR to promote their product. Outside of their name on the NASCAR Cup Series logo, and their name on the restart zone, what did they do to promote NASCAR? I’m really asking. GEICO has a seemingly unlimited advertising budget, but the fact that they didn’t use NASCAR to promote their product, well, that says a lot. Goodbye and good luck!

In related news, it was announced on Monday that FedEx will end their 20 year long sponsorship of Denny Hamlin’s #11 Toyota Camry. As Denny put it:

“It’s really hard to put into words because I got to know so many of the employees, so many of the executives over 20 years. I bleed purple. Every time that a FedEx truck goes by, my kids are yelling, ‘Daddy.’ That’s some of that brand awareness that I hear from fans, as well. Whether they are going to be on my racecar in the future or not, doesn’t matter, I’m still going to be a part of the purple family.”

We live in an era where sponsorship money is getting much harder to come by. Teams are increasingly reliant of sponsors to keep the lights on, especially with NASCAR making the decisions they do. The loss of a long-time sponsor can hurt, if not kill a team. I feel for Denny, but I also know that for a championship caliber driver, these problems can take care of themselves. I have no doubt he will land on his feet, and the team will have a full sponsorship for 2025 and beyond.

So, a few weeks ago, I discussed a situation in IndyCar where an employee stole intellectual property from one team and illegally gave it to another. Well, now it’s NASCAR’s turn. Though nothing concrete has been reported as of yet, it appears that a current engineer for Joe Gibbs Racing has committed the exact same offense.

According to an Associated Press article by Jenna Fryer:

“NASCAR has acknowledged it is aware of allegations that an engineer for a Cup Series team accessed proprietary information and shared it with another team.

The stock series released no details about the allegations because neither team has filed a complaint with NASCAR. But a series spokesman confirmed to The Associated Press at Charlotte Motor Speedway over the weekend it is aware of a brewing scandal between the two teams.

The engineer is in a contract year with Joe Gibbs Racing, according to executives with six teams who spoke with the AP on condition of anonymity because the details are considered private and have not been disclosed publicly. Joe Gibbs Racing, which has two cars still competing for the Cup title, declined to comment.

The engineer had been exploring options with other teams as the season draws to a close, multiple team officials told the AP on Sunday, confirming they discussed possible employment.

NASCAR acknowledged to AP it has heard that one team — with no cars in the playoffs — paid the engineer cash in exchange for setup information.”

If these accusations are true, and at this point, there is no concrete evidence to say for sure, whoever this small team is, they are in a lot of trouble. Any team that is willing to bribe an engineer for another team for setup information should not only be legally charged, but banned from participating in NASCAR forever. Remember, the FBI raided Rahal Letterman Lanigan for the exact same thing! You think that the FBI won’t get involved for a NASCAR team?

It boggles my mind that anyone thinks that trying this strategy will work. The FBI is smarter than you are, and they have more skills and resources than you do! Look at former Senator Bob Menendez. Look at Martin Shkreli. Look at Bernie Madoff. Look at everyone who thought they had the power to fool the system, and got caught. Now look at yourself…do you really think you can win here? The FBI can and will find evidence, and you will go down. I hope whatever you got out of this deal was worth losing everything, because that can and will happen.

Now we get to the end of the Martinsville race. First, let me discuss Christopher Bell’s move at the end of the race. Bell got put into the corner during the end of the race, and gunned the engine while on the wall. AT the end of the race, a discussion was held by NASCAR officials who determined that the move constituted a “wall ride” made famous by Ross Chastain in 2022, and banned thereafter.

The decision made was that Bell was trying to wall ride to get into the playoffs. As a result, Bell was removed from the playoffs, and William Byron was the fourth driver in the championship four. This was followed by an outcry from the fans about the way the situation was handled.

Here’s my take: The move Bell did could easily have been interpreted as a wall ride. He knew it was illegal, and why it was illegal. I get that he had a lot to lose, and he lost a lot. However rules are rules. Every driver and team needs to remember, you want to play in it, but at the end of the day, it’s NASCAR’s sandbox. It’s NASCAR’s sandbox, they make the rules. If they decide that you broke the rules, you broke the rules. You are one driver, and they will protect the sport over you. Life sucks, get used to it.

The first part of the story was announced by NASCAR:

“NASCAR has announced penalties following the Xfinity 500 NASCAR Cup Series race at Martinsville Speedway on Sunday.

The crew chiefs, spotters, and a team executive from the teams of #1-Ross Chastain, #3-Austin Dillon, and #23-Bubba Wallace have each been suspended for the Phoenix race following the team’s actions as the end of the Martinsville race. In addition each team and driver have been fined $100,000 and assessed a 50 point penalty.

Rule book section 4.4 B&D are as follows:

B. Member actions that could result in a loss of 25-50 driver and/or Team Owner Points and/or $25,000-$50,000 fine. Violations may also result in Race suspension(s), indefinite suspension, or membership revocation:

-Physical confrontation with a NASCAR Official, media members, fans, etc.

-Attempting to manipulate the outcome of the Race or championship. [emphasis added]

-Intentionally damaging another vehicle on pit road.

-Wrecking or spinning another vehicle, whether or not that vehicle is removed from Competition as a result.

-Any actions deemed to compromise the safety of an Event or otherwise pose a dangerous risk to the safety of Competitors, Officials, spectators, or others.

D. Member actions that could result in a fine and/or indefinite suspension, or membership revocation:

-Actions by a NASCAR Member that NASCAR finds to be detrimental to stock car racing or NASCAR. [emphasis added]

-Statement and/or communication made public (including social media platforms) that demeans, criticizes, ridicules, or otherwise disparages another person based upon that person’s race, color, creed, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, religion, age, or handicapping condition.

-Member-to-Member confrontation(s) with physical violence (e.g. striking another Competitor) and other violent manifestations such as significant threat(s) and/or abuse and/or endangerment.

-Multiple violations of the Code of Conduct.

-Selling NASCAR Single Event Credentials (VIP Passes, Essential Worker Passes, etc.).

-Being charged with or convicted of significant criminal violations (e.g. Domestic Violence, Trafficking, Assault), or having had determinations rendered by criminal or civil authorities that in NASCAR’s judgment necessitate action. NASCAR will not pre-judge guilt or innocence in the criminal or civil legal system, or the guilt or innocence of the Member, but rather review each matter in its own context and circumstances and with regards to its potential effects upon the sport.

-Violations of NASCAR’s Sports Gambling Policy.”

On November 7, 2024 NASCAR made the following announcement:

“The National Motorsports Appeals Panel today heard and considered an appeal of a behavior penalty issued on November 5, 2024 to driver Ross Chastain, owner Justin Marks, Competition Executive Tony Lunders, spotter Brandon McReynolds and crew chief Phil Surgen in the NASCAR Cup Series.

The penalty concerns the following sections of the 2024 NASCAR Rule Book: Sections 4.4.B&D Member Code of Conduct. The penalty issued was a $100,000 fine to both the driver and owner; a loss of 50 driver and owner points; and a one-race suspension to the competition executive, crew chief and spotter.

Upon hearing the testimony, the decisions of the National Motorsports Appeals Panel are:

That the Appellants violated the Rule(s) set forth in the Penalty Notice.

That the Panel affirms and upholds the original Penalty assessed by NASCAR.

In reaching the above decision, the panel provided the following explanation: “We feel in the best interest of racing and to protect the integrity of the sport, it was appropriate to uphold and affirm NASCAR’s decision with regard to the NASCAR rule 4.4, attempting to manipulate the outcome of the race.”

The Appellant has the right to appeal the decision of the National Motorsports Appeals Panel to the National Motorsports Final Appeals Officer in accordance with the NASCAR Rule Book.”

While this might seem pointless, remember the 2013 Federated Auto Parts 500, aka “Spingate.” That is considered the biggest race-fixing scandal in NASCAR, and one of the biggest race-fixing scandals in this history of racing. Spingate caused the death of Michael Waltrip Racing, and Front Row Racing came off looking horrible as a result. NASCAR has to put safety and the integrity of the sport above all else. As such, NASCAR will take any accusation or suspicious activity very seriously. If you do something that falls in the realm of cheating, it will be considered cheating. If you give them rope, you will get hung. NASCAR does NOT need to look weak right now. As the saying goes: “You can’t get caught if you don’t cheat.”

With that, this week’s column comes to an end, and I will do something for next week, be it the anti-trust suit or otherwise.

Sources cited:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Myers_Brothers_250

NASCAR officials award Bobby Allison with 85th Cup victory; legend now fourth on all-time win list

https://sports.yahoo.com/nascar-legend-bobby-allison-dies-at-86-001716069.html

GEICO to end Cup Series premier sponsorship

End of an era: Denny Hamlin reflects on 20 seasons with FedEx sponsorship

https://apnews.com/article/nascar-stolen-intellectual-property-428957bd87a87def4baf3b9c84a97e23

Catching Up On Racing Stories Part 1

By David G. Firestone

So the last few weeks have been very hectic, and I simply didn’t have the time to devote to The Driver Suit Blog. I will be covering some of the stories that either happens, or ones that I haven’t gotten to for this week, except for the anti-trust suit, as I feel it deserves it’s own column. This week, non-NASCAR stories.

First is a Formula 1 story that, at least to me, makes no sense whatsoever. Back in September, FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem has banned F1 drivers from swearing during races. In explaining his reasoning, he stated the following:

‘We have to differentiate between our sport – motorsport – and rap music. We’re not rappers, you know. They say the F-word how many times per minute? We are not on that. That’s them and we are [us]. I know, I was a driver. In the heat of the moment, when you think you are upset because another driver came to you and pushed you. But also, we have to be careful with our conduct. We need to be responsible people. Because imagine you are sitting with your children and watching the race and then someone is saying all of this dirty language. I mean, what would your children or grandchildren say? What would you teach them if that is your sport?’

Known profanity enthusiast Max Verstappen was, well, less than enthusiastic over the new ban. “A lot of people say a lot of bad things when they are full of adrenaline in other sports, it just doesn’t get picked up,’ he said in the pre-Singapore Grand Prix press conference on Thursday. I couldn’t even say the f word… It’s not even that bad. What are we 5-year-olds, 6-year-olds? I guess the world is changing a bit, but I guess it already starts with no broadcasting it. Or, not giving the option for people to hear it in general. That would help a lot more than putting bans on drivers.”

I’m taking Verstappen’s side here. Drivers in F1 have so much to focus on while racing, that expecting them to “mind their language” while driving isn’t a smart move. Let them race, and if they get frustrated, it happens. Sometimes drivers curse. It happens.

I’m also sick of this whole “protect the children” bullshit that populates some areas of culture. I shouldn’t be expected to to change my life for your kids. Your children are YOUR problems, not mine, not ours, yours! You, as a parent, are responsible for everything they eat, read, play with, watch, or interact with until they reach adulthood. Stop expecting the rest of the world to do it for you!

Now sticking with something else Formula 1 does that makes no sense, we discuss 2025. Apparently, F1 is eliminating the fastest lap bonus point for the 2025 season. Why? Why would you eliminate a bonus point? I’m a proponent of bonus points, since they encourge drivers to push themselves to perform better. The more points, the better! Why not encourage drivers to succeed?

I was against the idea of the new NASCAR point system that eliminated the points for laps led. I was against the idea of the NHRA eliminating bonuses for setting speed and ET records. I’m against this too! Sanctioning bodies should encourage performances, since it gives drivers and fans a better experience! I don’t get this logic at all!

Speaking of not getting logic at all, let’s talk about IndyCar. Last year, the disastrous race at Thermal was introduced. The racing wasn’t great, the attendance was embarrassing, the purse was cut in half, and nobody, and I mean NOBODY thought this could get worse. The race was an embarrassment.

Well, Marshal Pruitt of Racer.com has discussed that IndyCar s making a return to Thermal in 2025. As Pruit discussed:

“The non-points $1 Million Challenge was a first for Thermal in two regards as network television was brought to the facility to broadcast the event, and with the need to include IndyCar’s followers in the venture, the circuit opened its gates to fans for the first time by making a maximum of 2000 tickets available for purchase.

Initially listed at $2000 apiece, few tickets were sold, but weeks prior to the event, a 75-percent price drop was applied as new sales went for $500 per ticket; those who bought tickets at the full $2000 level were refunded the $1500 difference.

Although attendance figures weren’t provided, an estimated daily crowd in the low hundreds was seen at the event, and with plenty of lessons taken from the experience, Thermal is targeting the sale of 5000 general admission tickets which RACER understands could be set at $450 apiece for the Friday-Sunday event set for March 21-23. If all are sold, it would allow the club to generate north of $2 million and cover most of the sanction fee paid to Penske Entertainment and other event-specific operating costs.”

To quote comedian and actress Jamie Andrews: “If at first you don’t succeed, WHY? WHY AGAIN?” Nobody liked this! Teams, drivers, fans, sponsors, EVERYONE HATED THIS! Why bring it back? You couldn’t sell over 1,000 tickets of the available 2,000, so why would you think you could sell 5,000? Is this really anything else more than a glorified tire test?

IndyCar has a number of issues, and this doesn’t help with their public image. I liked the idea of Penske taking over, and that I thought he would improve things. Looking at the totality, this was false hope! He took the worst race of 2024, and thinks bringing it back for 2025 will somehow work this time? Seriously?

The sad thing is that there is a lot of room for IndyCar to grow, but if they keep up on the current path, it will continue to shrink! I’ve seen the TV numbers! No growth is happening! It’s almost like IndyCar is following the AEW method of doing the same mistakes repeatedly, and expecting the fans to unconditionally support them! Well, if things keep going this way, they will lose, not grow. That’s just a fact.

Alright that’s enough for this week, next week, NASCAR stories.

Sources Cited:

Max Verstappen hits back after F1 drivers are given ‘swearing ban’ by FIA president

https://www.espn.com/f1/story/_/id/41850538/f1-scrap-fastest-lap-bonus-point-2025

https://racer.com/2024/10/24/plans-coming-together-for-full-indycar-race-at-thermal-club/