My Thoughts On Kyle Larson and The Double

By David G. Firestone

Just a brief column this week, since I have other things to focus on. So I’ve been holding back on this one for a bit, but I’ve been wanting to talk about this for some time. For the last two seasons, Kyle Larson has attempted to run The Double, both the Indy 500 and the Coca Cola 600 on the same day. This has been tried by a number of drivers, with varying degrees of success. But the question that needs to be asked is: Is it a good idea to run The Double?

Simple question, simple answer, no. No it is not a good idea to run the double. Racing drivers are built different than the rest of us, that’s never been up to debate. But there are personal glass ceilings for everyone, and the human body has its limits. Even the best and most in-shape drivers shouldn’t be allowed to run 1,100 miles of racing over the course of 8 hours and over 200 MPH. No matter how good you think you are, the after-effects of that amount of physical exertion will catch up with you eventually.

My other issue with the idea of running The Double is that Kyle is fighting for a championship in The Cup Series. Even with multiple wins on the season, a wreck can do a lot of damage for a championship hunt. Even a playoff waiver can’t undo the damage that a wreck can do to the human body. If he was a part timer, that might be one thing, since he could take some time to recover afterwards. But he had go back to the track the next weekend.

As a driver, your safety should be your number one priority. Pushing yourself beyond your toughest limits, while admirable, could see the end of your career. No matter how safe you think your car is, there is always something that can go wrong. No matter how good you think you are, you are just as human, and just as mortal, as anyone else.

I want Kyle to have a long and prosperous career. I want him to succeed, but I think he really needs to give up on The Double if he wants a good career.

The Team Penske Situation

By David G. Firestone

During practice for the Indy 500, two Team Penske cars were busted for technical violation. This, in turn, led to the firing of Tim Cindric, IndyCar managing director Ron Ruzewski, and IndyCar general manager Kyle Moyer. Tim Cindric was the highest member of the team to be fired. According to Wikipedia:

“Tim Cindric served as the Team Manager for Team Rahal from 1994 to 1999, before joining Penske in October 1999. He was promoted to the position of president at Penske Racing in January 2006. He also serves as strategist for the Penske-owned IndyCar teams of Will Power (through 2016) and Josef Newgarden (from 2017). His teams won the IndyCar championship for the 2014, 2017 and 2019 seasons. He departed the team in May 2025, three days after Will Power and Josef Newgarden’s cars failed technical inspection for having a modified part during the Firestone Fast 12 in qualifying for the 2025 Indianapolis 500.”

The reason for the firing was the modification of a rear attenuator. What is a rear attenuator, I hear you ask, well, let’s look at a well-written article on Motorsport.com by Bozi Tatarevic.

“In order to understand what transpired at Team Penske, we need to start with the function of the rear attenuator on an IndyCar. This rectangular piece sits at the back of the car and is attached to the gearbox where it serves two basic roles. Its primary role is to absorb impact in a crash and reduce the g-forces felt by the driver. It also serves as the mount for the rain light assembly.

According to multiple sources that aren’t authorized to speak publicly, Team Penske started receiving these updated attenuators back from Dallara in early 2024 and members of leadership were not pleased with the aesthetics of the new glued-on panels as they showed a bright glue line that stood out and with a large raised edge. A member of the technical leadership is rumored to have instructed members of their team to “clean up” the edges on the pieces in order to make the bright glue stand out less so these technicians applied a dark compound to the edges and smoothed them out.

Once these attenuators were modified, they were cleaned up and coated with sealer – per the standard procedure for many carbon fiber parts at Penske – and placed into their parts rotation to be installed on the cars to start the 2024 season.”

This whole situation is amazing, since, realistically, it didn’t provide any on-track advantage at all, and was just for aesthetic purposes. Many fans are complaining that IndyCar overreacted to the violation. Realistically, there could be other reasons for the firings.

It’s not out of the realm of possibility that were other things that were brewing in Team Penske. Looking at the standings, it’s clear Team Penske isn’t where they need to be, in terms of on track performance. I’m willing to bet that Roger Penske saw the opportunity to clean house, which isn’t a bad thing. Sometimes you have to take what isn’t working, throw it out, and try something new.

But this brings me back to something that’s not talked about as much. The fact that the owner of IndyCar also owns a team in IndyCar is a massive conflict of interest. Say what you want, but if the NFL, NBA, NHL, or MLB owned one of the teams while the rest were owned by outsiders, wouldn’t that be a conflict of interest?

The fact is that Roger Penske does not look good here at all. He may have fired three of his top guys, but that still doesn’t make him innocent in all of this. If you are the owner of a business, and your subordinates make a mistake, even if you weren’t at said business, it’s still on you. Nobody blames the janitor when the company goes bankrupt. Nobody blames the guy in the mailroom when a major industrial accident happens. The top brass gets the blame.

Roger needs to sell Team Penske if he is going to own IndyCar. It’s just that simple. Even if he his not involved, his name is still on the team. He will still be blamed for everything, regardless of personal involvement. Any boss who claims that he isn’t responsible for his subordinate’s actions needs to be replaced anyway.

In addition, the conflict of interest will only make things worse. If the owner of the league’s team gets busted again, or suddenly starts seeing success without explanation, wouldn’t that look suspicious? Roger Penske has given his critics all the rope they will ever need to hang him with, and they will hang him at some point, it’s just a matter of time. This will not end well at all.

Sources Cited:

Some Thoughts On Recent WWE Releases

By David G. Firestone

So I was going to devote this week’s column to the Team Penske IndyCar cheating situation, but I have a lot more to say than I thought I would, so I will save that for at least next week. I’ve been sitting on this for some time, and I want to discuss this. As is typical in the period after Wrestlemania, WWE has released a number of wrestlers.

Those who were released include main roster members Braun Strowman, Shayna Baszler, Dakota Kai, Kayden Carter,and Katana Chance. On the NXT/developmental side, those released were Cora Jade, Gigi Dolin, Joe Coffey, Mark Coffey, Wolfgang, Eddy Thorpe, Riley Osborne, Oro Mensah, Jakara Jackson, Javier Bernal, and Dani Palmer.

Whenever these releases happen, fans cry and crow for a while, and claim that WWE shouldn’t release talent. To that, I say, yes they should. First off, WWE is a for-profit company, and profits are key. It should also be noted that, after the last few years, WWE and TKO had a lot of debt, and costs involved in the merger, so the “profit” isn’t as great as it was.

Why is this an issue? Well, let’s do some math. There were a total of 17 performers released. If we assume they were all making the $250,000 minimum, this comes to a total of $4,250,000 that is directly saved by releasing these performers. It should be noted that some talent, including Braun Strowman, and Shayna Baszler were making much more than the minimum.

But there is a second reason these cuts are needed. WWE is the top echelon of professional wrestling. There is nothing higher. There are a lot of wrestlers in other promotions, or on the indies, who would love to be in WWE, and many of them have the talent to make it to WWE. When you are in the top echelon of anything, sports, business, or otherwise, there is the need to perform at the highest level.

This brings me to a concept I call the “personal glass ceiling.” The idea of a personal glass ceiling is that everybody has a point that they reach, where no matter what, they can’t go any higher. There are opportunities above them, but their personal limits prevent them from reaching new heights. This affects everybody, regardless of gender, race, religion, or ability. Even if you are fortunate enough to get to the top echelon, your career can and will be limited by your own limitations.

Don’t misunderstand me, I’m not knocking, or disrespecting any of the released wrestlers, far from it. They all had the skill, talent, and ability to perform at the top echelon of professional wrestling. 99.999999% of us can’t do what they did. That should be applauded. But when there are a lot of hungry mouths, and only a few spots at the top table, sometimes, it won’t work out.

Professional wrestling, like any other occupation is constantly changing, and constantly evolving. What worked yesterday, might nor work today..What works today, might not work tomorrow. For some, their time at the top table was brief, but for others it was much longer. Changing times call for changing rosters. It’s like that in every job. I’ve worked at the same job since 2007, and I can say that the job does evolve, and it does change. If it changes to the point I am no longer needed, I can and will be sent packing. That’s just a fact of life.

In the end, every single person at a job has a personal glass ceiling. Every single person at a job also has an expiration date, and for many of us, it’s out of our control. My advice is not to worry over things you can’t control. It doesn’t do anybody any good.

Starbucks and Stupidity

By David G. Firestone

As anyone who knows me will attest, I hate coffee. I haven’t had a cup since 2006. As such, I don’t go to Starbucks. Well, last week, after I wrote my column for the week, I came across an article on Starbucks. Specifically, how a number of Gen Z baristas are up in arms over the new dress policy. What specifically is the issue? well, according to the chain itself:

“That’s why, starting May 12, we’re evolving our dress code in all stores to focus on simplified color options that allow our iconic green apron to shine and create a sense of familiarity for our customers, no matter which store they visit across North America.

The more defined color palette includes any solid black short and long-sleeved crewneck, collared, or button-up shirts and any shade of khaki, black, or blue denim bottoms. We’re also making a new line of company branded t-shirts available to partners, who will receive two at no cost – including partner network options.”

Yes, you read that correctly. The Starbucks union employees are up in arms over the fact that the chain is mandadting them wearing a black polo shirt. As dumb as that may sound, here is a snippet from the New York Post article:

“In a video posted to X, Starbucks union workers in Seattle can be seen marching on management in response to the new dress code.

The clip was captioned, “Starbucks workers across the country are facing understaffing, inaccessible benefits, discrimination, and low wages.

“Instead of fixing these issues, Starbucks decided to introduce an unpopular, more conservative dress code.”

A barista wearing a bandana and a party hat can be seen addressing management, saying, “I don’t understand how [the dress code] is in good faith of letting us express ourselves.”

Another worker then says, “We’re just expected to lie down and accept it,” as union members clap and cheer.”

To those who think that this policy is unfair, let me add my own take. Young people have a tendency to be dumb, but this new crop, holy shit!

I’ve worked a number of different jobs in various fields over the years. Every single one of them had a dress code which outlined what I could and couldn’t wear. Sometimes the rules were for aesthetic reasons, khakis and polo to look professional, and sometimes they were for safety reasons, no loose clothes near machinery. Rules are rules, and you have to follow them, even if you think they are unfair.

It’s called being an adult. You’re going to have to grow up at some point. When you get hired to work anywhere, you work for the company, but the company does NOT have to work for you! You WILL spend a lot of time being unhappy, and life will be unfair against you, more often than not. Grown up adults can accept it, but these adult children can’t.

On the Fark.com comment section, one comment, made by

DeathByGeekSquad has a very apt take on Starbucks employees:

“There are three types of people who work at Starbucks stores.

“1. The manager – the person who is or wants to manage a store for the sake of padding their resume for a few years.

2. The paycheck earner – the person who is there while they figure things out but generally just cashing their check

3. The complacent – the people who want to do as little as possible to earn just enough to cover basics and complain about their life. They’re not out looking for better jobs, or looking to do anything that improves their chances of better employment.

The first two don’t care about dress code requirements, it’s part of the job. The third complains about everything, and therefore complains about dress code. They’ll also complain about Partner Services. The Playbook. The hours. The manager. The Assistant Store Manager. The customers. The menu. Their coworkers.

They’re a toxic presence at an otherwise smooth operation.

They’re made up of the dropouts, the people who are too stupid to become an ASM or Shift Manager, or semi-functional addicts looking for a payday.”

Starbucks isn’t a high-end cafe in a rich part of town. Starbucks isn’t a highly praised local or regional coffe house. Starbucks is pretty much the McDonald’s of coffee chains. People don’t visit Starbucks because of what the barista is wearing. You are there to make coffee, not put on a fashion show. Wearing a polo as part of your employment isn’t “fascism,” it isn’t “repression,” it isn’t “censorship.” It is, at best, a minor inconvenience.

Anybody who feels that their anger is justified is also part of the problem, in my eyes at least. Rather than just accept that rules are rules, and that life is unfair, they just can’t accept it, even though they are adults. Again, I’ve worked in many different jobs, in different fields, and all of them have had very specific dress codes. I had them in elementary, middle, and high school. College was more relaxed, but there were still rules. Just go to Amazon, and buy some cheap polo shirts. It’s not the end of the world, and it really doesn’t warrant union intervention.

I’m not a big corporations suck-up, but I do NOT have any sympathy for grown-up children who have no clue whatsoever how to be adults. Adults can handle dress codes and can abide by them, with no issues whatsoever. Grown-up children don’t like being told what to do, and will cry over the most meaningless issues. Sadly, the grown-up children will never learn, and these issues will come back again. Seriously, life is unfair, just accept it!

Sources Cited:

My Thoughts On Shedeur Sanders

By David G. Firestone

I’m not the biggest NFL fan, and I don’t watch college sports at all. But the biggest story of the NFL Draft was Shedeur Sanders. Shedeur Sanders, is the son of legendary NFL Hall of Famer Deion Sanders. Coming out of Colorado, many people thought his on-field talent would make him a first-round draft pick, but he got drafted in the fifth round. For some people, this was “racist,” for some, this was perplexing.

But for me, this was another case of a kid with too big of an ego for his own good. Many of the more level-headed people pointed out that the average Joe Schmo is not a talent scout. But I think Albert Breer’s take on Shedeur Sanders is very abt. This is from “NFL Draft Takeaways: An Honest Discussion About Shedeur Sanders,” on SI.com link at the . Here are some key points:

“This starts with teams’ evaluations of Sanders as a player. The story we had on Tuesday on the quarterback class as a whole covered it. If you read that, you know it wasn’t easy to find coaches or scouts who viewed the Colorado quarterback as a first-round talent coming into the draft. He’s not a great athlete. He didn’t show great arm talent. He had bad habits in taking unnecessary sacks and bailing out of the back of the pocket. He had trouble playing on time in general and did things off-schedule that weren’t going to translate to the NFL.

A lot of times in combine meetings, teams will have a player’s worst plays ready for him when he enters the room and, along those lines, one had a particularly rough interception teed up for Sanders in Indianapolis. When asked to explain it, Sanders didn’t take blame. And as they dove deeper into it, and how it might relate to the NFL level, Sanders simply concluded that maybe he and the staff he was talking to might not be a match.

Ahead of another visit, he got an install with mistakes intentionally planted in it—done to see if a quarterback would catch them. Sanders didn’t catch them. A coach called him on it, and the resulting exchange wasn’t pretty.

Instead, in this case, a lot of teams either had a tough experience with Sanders or didn’t have an experience with him at all. Which made it tough to spend a pick on him, because if you were looking for a developmental quarterback who’d be content to slide into the shadows and work at his craft, this didn’t seem like the guy.”

This is another example of a point I’ve been making over the years. It’s simply impossible to judge anything solely on how successful it is. Too many athletes, musicians, actors, politicians, and celebrities are finding out that if you give anybody the rope they need, they will hang you with it. Shedeur Sanders is no exception.

Professional sports is full of athletes with big egos, that’s to be expected. Sometimes though, an athlete’s ego is too big for his own good. That’s the problem with Shedeur Sanders. Based on everything I’ve seen so far, he clearly thinks he is 1000% more important than he really is. If he was as egotistical as he is, but was as talented as Tom Brady, he’d would have been a first-round pick. His talent didn’t equal his ego, and now he’s a developmental player for the Cleveland Browns.

But there’s another issue at play here. Specifically, the NFL Combine, and the various meetings. If Shedeur Sanders had any common sense, he’d understand that the NFL Combine is the football equivalent of the first part of a job interview. A huge lesson I learned in middle school about job interviews is that the best thing you can do is to convince the company hiring you that you don’t make bad decisions. Shedeur Sanders never got that lesson. Read the quotes I posted again. It’s clear that he didn’t really understand the significance of the meetings, and if he did, he didn’t care.

Say whatever you want about Deion Sanders’ ego, but you can’t argue he didn’t back it up. Hell, Deion Sanders was the first and only player to both play in both a Super Bowl and World Series, but who also WON both a Super Bowl, and World Series. While it’s also clear that Shedeur Sanders has the ego of Deion, but not the on-field talent of Deion.

Here’s the bottom line: It’s clear from everything that Shedeur Sanders wasn’t meant to be a first-round pick, and that he needs work on his game, and work on his ego. While he still has hope for making it in the NFL, it’s going to be a long road, and he’s going to need a lot of humility, which, I don’t think is going to happen, at least not very easily. He can prove everyone wrong, but does he really have the work ethic to do so? Time will tell.

Sources Cited:

A Brief Note This Week…

By David G. Firestone

Just a brief update for this week. So, due to reasons that were beyond my control, I didn’t upload anything the week before Easter. This was due to a series of personal and family issues. While I’d like to say that everything is back to normal, sadly, this is the new normal for me and my family. As such, due to theses personal issues, it’s less than clear where The Driver Suit Blog will go from here.

What I can say is for the time being, I will try and regularly upload and post, but real life can and will get in the way. If I’m not able to post as much as I previously had, that’s why. I’m not giving up on The Driver Suit Blog, at least not yet. That’s really all I have for this week.

It’s So Satisfying When Bad Things Happen To Bad People

By David G. Firestone

Sometimes in life, luck is on our side. Sometimes luck is against us. We all hate seeing bad things happen to good people, and we all hate seeing good things happen to bad people. On the other hand, it’s always satisfying when good things happen to good people, and when bad things happen to bad people. Today, we focus on the latter.

Johnny Somali, real name Ramsey Khalid Ismael, is an IRL streamer, who claims he is an internet troll. His MO is to travel to other countries to piss off as many people as possible, by being racist and ignorant. He is basically the kid who would eat paste for a nickel, only he annoys citizens of the country he is in for a $5 donation. He’s been banned from most streaming platforms, including Kick. Do you know how much of a douche you have to be to get kicked off of Kick?

In his travels, he traveled to Japan in 2023, and promptly proceeded to make an ass out of himself. He frequently made references to the atomic bombings, made numerous racist statements, got beaten up, and was arrested. He went to Israel, and conduted himself in much the same way. In both cases, he was arrested, and deported. At this point, he felt himself to be invincible. But he forgot one thing. Karma has a unique way of showing up at the worst possible time.

Johnny Somali’s downfall began on September 27, 2024, when he traveled to Seoul, South Korea. He acted the same way he did in Japan and Israel, only this time, he overlooked one critical detail. South Korea isn’t as tolerant of these issues as other countries. Currently, he is on probation, and is prevented from leaving the country. He is facing five charges, and was set to attend court on March 7, 2025.

In this situation, where you are facing serious charges, I would take this as seriously as possible, and be on my best behavior. Not Johnny Somali. Somali showed up to court over an hour late, was incredibly hungover due to a “shots for donations” livestream, and wore a MAGA hat. Court officials told Somali to take the hat off, but he kept putting it back on. During the hearing, it became clear he wasn’t getting another slap on the wrist. Each of the five charges carries the potential of five years in prison. He’s going to trial next month, and I’m looking forward to it.

Johnny Somali has proven himself to be a clown, a troll, and a moron. He’s a trash streamer, who will do anything for a $5 donation. He has never been put in check and all, until this most recent incident. Now, he’s going to prison, hopefully for a long time. Sadly, there are a lot of Johnny Somali style streamers, and we need to send a message to them, that we won’t tolerate this behavior at all.

Now we move on to our second story. Hulk Hogan’s ex-wife Linda Hogan went on an unhinged rant on her family life. She talked about her hatred for Hulk, and blamed him for their daughter Brooke not being a part of her life. It’s such an amazing rant that I can’t really do it justice. But let’s dive a little deeper into Linda Hogan.

Hulk and Linda were married in 1983 and divorced in 2009. During the divorce, Linda dated a man 29 years younger than she was. She took Hulk to the cleaners in the divorce. In terms of personality, she is just as bad as Hulk. She’s just as selfish and narcissistic as Hulk. She is an awful person, and is undeserving of mercy.

Linda’s rant drew the attention of Brooke Hogan, now married with two kids. I’m going to post some of her response here.

“There was a recent video posted by my mother that was concerning enough for people to send to me, making me feel the need to address the tip of a very large iceberg that is my immediate family. What little I am addressing does not even scratch the surface of what I’ve dealt with my entire life.

I will start by saying this video is mild compared to the behavior I have witnessed for the greater portion of my life. This also comes in addition to false claims that she has previously posted and then deleted. That being said, she has been through a lot of trauma and pain—my heart breaks for her. You can’t control how others treat you, but you can control how you treat others and how you cope with things.

Too many times, I have ignored things said about me and haven’t spoken my truths. Even so, I will keep things as vague as possible to continue to protect people… people who should have protected me.

Most importantly, I have completely separate reasons for going no contact with each of my parents. No contact with my mom has nothing to do with my dad, and no contact with my father has nothing to do with my mother. This also pertains to my dad’s second and third, now current, wife. This decision was made based purely on how they have each dealt with me directly my entire life.

I have been EXTREMELY verbally and mentally abused since childhood. Sadly, it would frequently turn physical. And sometimes, it’s not by the person you would assume—abuse comes in all shapes and sizes. This vicious pattern has robbed me of any sense of self-esteem or confidence—I’ve been trained to pretend I have it.

Up until adulthood, I’ve received berating and vile text messages, verbal and public reamings with unbelievably hurtful words said to me that cannot be forgotten. I’ve been asked to defend poor behavior to the public and have done so out of love, only to find I was misinformed, manipulated, and lied to. Still, to this day, I face constant ridicule for the poor decisions of others.

I’ve watched others benefit financially off my suffering and embarrassment caused by their selfish behavior. While it caused my life to crumble, I continued to stay strong and silent.

I was expected to—and DID— forgive massive blows to my career and personal life, nasty behavior, omissions of truth, blatant lies, manipulation, and repetitive errors in hopes of renewing previous family bonds.

I’ve been used as a pawn, a buffer, and treated like I’m downright stupid, too. No child or human should ever experience something like this.

Feeling injustice, not speaking my truth, dealing with smear campaigns, flying monkeys, enablers of this behavior, watching fake win over what’s real, and losing other family members and friends in an attempt to stop gossip and ongoing drama is also a painful side effect of this decision I deal with daily.

I gave endless chances hoping for the best and was met with more disrespect. At a certain point, I had to stop setting myself on fire to keep others warm.

One day, my family will look back and see that I never exposed the full truth. I was a waitress making $2.13 an hour to build a business of my own with no help from anyone. Nobody can take that away from me.

You can forgive people but still not allow them to mistreat you. I have nothing left to give to people who take, take, take, and never give in return. I choose peace. But my silence and my kindness should not be mistaken for weakness.

There are far more important things in this world. There are people out there trying to survive. And yet, there are families who have had all the opportunities in the world, and still choose to destroy each other.”

Based on everything I’ve seen, I fully believe Brooke’s side of things. She’s clearly hurt, she’s clearly avoiding the spotlight, and she is the most believable of the group. But what really strikes me here is that she did something that many people can’t, or won’t do…cut ties and run.

I am a big believer in cutting ties with people who are toxic. Many people in my life think I’m toxic, and have cut me out of their life. I’ve done the same with a lot of people. Brooke is smart enough to realize that Hulk and Linda were Superfund levels of toxic, and the only escape is to cut and run. She doesn’t want her kids to experience the same toxicity she had to endure. She is, without a doubt, the most mature and intelligent member of that family.

I don’t care who they are to you, I don’t care how much they may have meant to you, and I don’t care how much you may love them. Anybody who tries to tear you down for their own selfishness is toxic, and should be cut out of your life quickly. Don’t let them destroy you. I applaud Brooke, and I’m glad she’s in a good place now. She summed it up better. “At a certain point, I had to stop setting myself on fire to keep others warm.”

Sources Cited:

Ranking The 2025 Throwbacks Schemes So Far…

By David G. Firestone

Well, the throwback race is behind us, and, as pre the usual, I will rank the throwback schemes from best to worst. Let’s go!

1-Austin Cindric #2 Freightliner Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, based on Dale Earnhart’s 1979 Daytona 500 Rod Osterlund Racing #2 Buick. A

If I had a favorite non-Goodwrench Dale Sr scheme, it would be this one. No disrespect for Wrangler, but this is so much better! Unless something better comes along, this is my pick for Throwback of the Year! A

2-Kyle Larson #5 HendrickCars.com Throwback Chevy CamaroNew scheme for 2025, based on Terry Labonte’s 2001 #5 Kellogg’s Chevy. A

I can’t really knock this scheme, but I have too much love for the 1990’s Kellogg’s scheme. This is great, so this gets an A.

3-JJ Yeley #44 Wawa Throwback Chevy CamaroNew scheme for 2025, based on Bill Elliot’s 1989 Coors Ford Thunderbird. A

A good look, very faithful, this gets an A.

4-Ty Dillon #10 Beaver Street Fisheries Throwback Chevy CamaroNew sponsor for 2025, based on Patty Moise’s 1989 Daytona #45 Beaver Street Foods Buick. A

I love the look, it’s a very faithful throwback, and I love the CHEVY on the hood! A

5-Noah Gragson #4 Beef-a-Roo Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, Based on Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s 1996 #31 Mom ‘n’ Pops Chevy. A

I like the look, and I think Mom ‘n’ Pops should make a NASCAR comeback. A

6-Joey Logano #22 Shell Pennzoil Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, based on Cale Yarborough’s #11 Holly Farms Poultry Oldsmobile. A

This is a scheme that doesn’t get a lot of love, but boy do I love this! A

7-Josh Berry #21 Motorcraft/Quick Lane Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, based on Jim Clark’s 1965 Indianapolis 500 winning #82 Lotus powered by Ford. A

Another amazing throwback, this one an Indy 500 winner that transfers well to NASCAR. A

8-Todd Gilliland #34 Ruedebusch Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, based on Based on Ray Fox’s #3 Royal Dodge Dodge Charger. A

It’s obscure, but it’s faithful, and it looks good. A

9-John Hunter Nemechek #42 Dollar Tree Throwback Toyota CamryNew scheme for 2025, based on Joe Nemechek’s 1997-1998 #42 Bell South Mobility Chevy. A

This is a scheme where the new colors work so much better than the old ones! I like the old colors, but the new colors are better. A

10-Erik Jones #43 Advent Health Throwback Toyota CamryNew scheme for 2025, based on John Andretti’s 1998 STP scheme. A

Even though I think there are better Petty STP schemes, this is a faithful replica, so this gets an A.

11-William Byron #24 Axalta Throwback Chevy CamaroNew scheme for 2025, based on Jeff Gordon’s final race #24 Chevy. A

As much as I liked the original scheme, I, like a lot of fans, felt that Jeff should have raced the original rainbow warriors scheme. Still, this is really good. A

12-Cody Ware #51 Jacob Construction Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, based on Ward Burton’s 1999-2003 Caterpillar schemes. A

Cat schemes can be hit or miss, but this is a hit. A

13-Denny Hamlin #11 Sport Clips Haircuts Throwback Toyota CamryNew scheme for 2025, based on Carl Edwards’ #99 Office Depot Ford. A

A good, faithful throwback, and the look works well. A

14-Alex Bowman #48 Ally Throwback Chevy CamaroNew scheme for 2025, based on Jimmie Johnson’s 2012 Southern 500 winning #48 Lowe’s Chevy. A

It’s simple, but effective, and faithful, so this gets an A.

15-Zane Smith #38 Long John Silver’s Throwback Ford MustangNo change. A

Same scheme as last year, same A grade.

16-Christopher Bell #20 DeWalt Outdoors Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, based on Rick Ferkel’s #0 sprint car. B

A little too different from the original scheme, in terms of colors and design. It’s not bad, but far from perfect. B

17-Cole Custer will drive the No. 41 Haas Automation Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, based on Jimmy Spencer’s 2001 #41 Target Dodge. B

I never really liked the Spencer Target schemes, they used a bit too much white for my taste. That said, it’s still a decent look, so it gets a B.

18-Ryan Blaney #12 Menards/Dutch Boy Throwback Ford MustangNew scheme for 2025, based on Dave Blaney’s 2006 Dollar General 300 winning #32 Haas Avocados Chevy. B

A little too different from the original scheme, in terms of colors and design. It’s not bad, but far from perfect. B

19-Chase Elliott #9 UniFirst Chevy Throwback CamaroNew scheme for 2025, based on Ken Schrader’s 1994 #25 Kodiak Chevy. C

As a scheme it’s fine, but as a throwback it falls flat. It’s too different from the original. I’ll give this a C.

Liam Lawson and Saraya…Two Justified Releases!

By David G. Firestone

So the Liam Lawson experiment at Red Bull Racing is officially over. Lawson started the first two races, but was replaced by Yuki Tsunoda starting at Japan. Why the sudden shift? Well, let’s look at an analysis by Lawrence Barretto on Formula1.com:

“The New Zealander had a low-key pre-season test in Bahrain – and then endured a miserable debut weekend in Australia, qualifying 18th and then crashing in the race. Sources say one senior member of the team raised the prospect of demoting him after that weekend.

Then in China, he became the first Red Bull driver in their 20-year history to qualify last, when he ended up 20th in Sprint Qualifying and he did so again for the Grand Prix. While he was classified 12th – helped in part by three disqualifications – Red Bull called an internal meeting for after the race weekend to discuss his future.

Sources say the shareholders, plus Team Principal Christian Horner and Red Bull Motorsport Adviser Helmut Marko, agreed unanimously that Lawson should go back to Racing Bulls with immediate effect, ahead of the Japanese Grand Prix, with Tsunoda stepping up to replace him.

This was after they had looked at Lawson’s data from testing and the opening two races and concluded that he wasn’t performing to a high enough level, even if they conceded that it was a very difficult car to drive.

It’s believed the team accepted that Lawson had also lost his confidence after conceding he couldn’t understand why he wasn’t able to get pace out of the car.”

To some, this seems to be unfair to Lawson. To those, I say…tough shit! This isn’t karting, this isn’t F3, or F2, THIS IS F1!!! There are a lot of hungry drivers, but only a few seats at the top table. If you get a spot, but can’t keep it, someone else will step up and claim it. It’s no different than NASCAR, IndyCar, the NFL, the NBA, and so on. Those who can’t keep up get replaced.

Liam Lawson is another motorsports hype job. He is a driver who impressed in the lower ranks, and impressed during testing. But the moment he got the chance in the major leagues, he choked. Red Bull Racing looked over their data, saw that he was all hype, and replaced him. The needs of the team matter more than the needs of the individual driver. If this were a lower level F1 team, maybe they would have kept him, but not Red Bull Racing.

I’m not like these other morons who think he should have gotten another shot, or more time. He was given a shot in the major leagues, and choked. If you get a shot at being a Formula 1 driver, whatever you did in the minor leagues isn’t relevant anymore. You could be the greatest F3 or F2 driver, but if you suck in F1, that’s all anyone is going to remember. Again, it’s no different than NASCAR, IndyCar, the NFL, the NBA, and so on. Those who can’t keep up get replaced. Liam Lawson is another one of those guys.

Speaking of releases, let’s talk AEW. Tony Khan rarely releases talent, but what he loves to do is ghost talent until their contract ends. We’ve seen this quite a bit. But the latest victim of the Tony Khan ghosting is Saraya. Saraya, AKA Paige, joined AEW in 2022. She had wrestled in WWE both NXT and the Main Roster from 2011-2018, when a neck injury should have ended her in-ring career. Never the less, she was an on-air talent for WWE until her contract ended in 2022.

With WWE solidly behind her, even making a movie about her life, during her time with WWE, she caused some controversies. One such controversy was the leaking of a sex tape between herself, Brad Maddox, and Xavier Woods. There were a number of other incidents as well. She was getting paid a lot, but she wasn’t that valuable to WWE during that time. So, in 2022, WWE and Saraya parted ways and she signed with AEW.

In a move than can only be described as ungrateful, upon arrival in AEW, one of her first moves was to talk shit about WWE and how much better AEW is. This is the same WWE that paid her more than she was ever going to be worth to the company, while at the same time, causing a lot of bad PR for WWE. Her in-ring work was mediocre, and she really wasn’t that much of a stand out, especially when compared to the other ex-WWE talent AEW signed.

After her release, she claimed that she wanted to return to WWE and reclaim the Paige character. To that, I say, HELL NO! After all the bullshit she put WWE through in her career, all the money they paid her, and even financing a biographical movie on her life, I wouldn’t blame WWE for not resigning her. You look at talent like Brock Lesnar, Matt Riddle, and even Vince McMahon, who were more valuable to the company than Saraya ever was, and are now persona non grata, why should she get another chance? Hell, WWE released Carmella, and she has been more valuable since 2022 than Saraya was.

Here’s the bottom line. I do not think WWE should resign Saraya given everything I’ve said up to this point. I do not think she is a good fit for the current women’s division. I do not think that she would be able to wrestle, or if she would be medically cleared. What I do think is that the indie scene is a better fit for her. She went out of her way to cause problems and burn bridges in WWE, and WWE does not need her anymore.

I’ve said this before, every career has an expiration date, and sometimes that date comes sooner than you want it to be. In many instances, this expiration date is sped up because you are your own worst enemy. Matt Riddle, Brock Lesnar, and Enzo Amore were popular merch movers, and made WWE millions of dollars, yet WWE had no reservation distancing themselves from them. Saraya is no different. She isn’t worth much to WWE in 2025, and they both know it. I wish her well in the indipendent scene.

Sources Cited: