My Thoughts On The End Of The Penny

By David G. Firestone

This will be my last column before my annual summer vacation, where I take the month of July off, to spend the summer with friends, and enjoying myself. Before I do, I’ve been wanting to discuss the recent news that the United States Mint will cease production of the penny. It needs to be clarified for some people that the penny will continue to circulate and is still legal tender.

The cited reason for eliminating the penny is the costs involved in producin the penny, specifically the fact that each individual penny costs. In the words of Chris Isidore and Matt Egan of CNN:

“A Treasury spokesperson said the government made its final order of penny blanks this month, and the United States Mint will continue to manufacture pennies only as long as an inventory of penny blanks exists. Consumers with pennies will still be able to use them for purchases. But without new pennies moving into circulation, businesses that complete cash transactions will have to start rounding up or down to the nearest nickel.

Each penny costs 3.7 cents to produce and distribute. While production costs have risen for each of the coins below, pennies and nickels are the only two that cost more to make than they’re worth. In 2024, it cost four times more to make a penny and three times more to make a nickel than it did 20 years ago.

But the cost of a penny might be a smaller problem than the alternative. That’s because the Mint actually loses even more money on each nickel it produces. Each nickel costs 13.8 cents, with 11 cents of production costs and 2.8 cents of administrative and distribution costs. These figures are for the government’s most recent fiscal year, which ended in September.”

First off, lets discuss this idea that pennies will vanish sooner than later. According to estimates, there are as many as 114 billion pennies currently in circulation. Since the US population is 340 million, this means that there are 325 pennies per citizen in the US. Second, unlike a dollar bill, which has a useful life of 2 years, pennies have a lifespan that lasts for decades. It’s going to take on hell of a long time for pennies to be few and far between.

The most crucial aspect to why people shouldn’t really be worried is that we are closer and closer to being a cashless society. Seriously, cash only businesses are fewer, and cashless stores are more common. Are we going to see some stores roll up to the nearest nickel for cash purchases, but it’s not an immediate threat.

Also, who is to say that this decision can’t be reversed. My thinking here is that if copper is too expensive, then another metal can be used. Same thing with nickels. If costs are too much, why not change the metal? We saw this back in 1965, when silver was taken out nickels and quarters. Who is to say that a more cost-effective metal can’t be used? Time will tell, of course.

But this got me to thinking…when was the last time the US Mint officially canceled a denomination of coin? With the help of Wikipedia, I was able to find a list of obsolete us coins. They are, in order of denomination:

-Half cent ½¢ (1793–1857)

-Fugio cent 1¢ (1787)

-Large cent 1¢ (1793–1857)

-Two-cent piece 2¢ (1864–1873)

-Three-cent silver 3¢ (1851–1873)

-Three-cent nickel 3¢ (1865–1889)

-Trime 3¢ 1865–1889

-Half disme 5¢ (1792)

-Half dime 5¢ (1792–1873)

-Twenty-cent piece 20¢ (1875–1878)

-Gold dollar $1 (1849–1889)

-Quarter eagle $2.50 (1796–1929)

-Three-dollar piece $3 (1854–1889)

-Half eagle $5 (1795–1929)

-Eagle $10 (1795–1933)

-Double eagle $20 (1850–1933)

So the last time the US eliminated a denomination of coin was 1933. However, the Eagle and Double Eagle were eliminated due to the Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 1934. Outside of that, there haven’t really been many coins that have ceased production since the late 1800’s. Again, with the number of pennies in circulation, and the fact that we are closer and closer to being a cashless society, it won’t be a big issue for some time, and a lot can happen.

With that, I’m going fishing, see you in August!

Sources Cited:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Reserve_Act

Sources Cited:
https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/22/business/us-discontinue-penny
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsolete_denominations_of_United_States_currency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Reserve_Act

Some News Stories This Week

By David G. Firestone

So some newsworthy racing stories happened this week. The first of came from the NHRA. I’ll quote the NHRA from their own website:

“NHRA has levied a $5,000 fine and deducted 100 championship points from Erica Enders’ score for the use of rear wheels at the Super Grip NHRA Thunder Valley Nationals that did not meet NHRA’s approved specifications for Pro Stock.

Following the disqualification of Erica Enders’ run during the fourth round of qualifying on Saturday in Bristol due to the use of rear wheels that did not meet NHRA’s approved specifications for Pro Stock, the following additional penalties have been announced: a 100-point deduction and a $5,000 fine.

The team has the right to appeal the financial penalty if they wish to do so. The funds collected from this fine will be used to support and enhance the capabilities of the NHRA Safety Safari.”

The NHRA later followed up on this statement clarifying the issue at hand:

“The NHRA Technical Department has issued a statement to further explain the fine and points penalty levied on Erica Enders’ Pro Stock team after it was found to be equipped with prohibited beadlock liner wheels at the Super Grip NHRA Thunder Valley Nationals.

Following the fourth round of qualifying at the Super Grip NHRA Thunder Valley Nationals in Bristol, Erica Enders’ Pro Stock car was found to be equipped with beadlock liner wheels, including an inner liner tire. These wheels and (inner/liner) tires were originally developed to provide increased sidewall support during launch and reduce the likelihood of tire shake. The widespread adoption of this combination in other categories where wheel liners are legal demonstrates that the performance benefits of improved tire support outweigh the added weight.

Based on this, the NHRA Technical Department determined that the use of these wheels and (inner/liner) tires was intended to create a performance advantage not permitted in the Pro Stock category.

The 2025 NHRA Rulebook clearly states that “…unless optional performance equipment or performance-related modification is specifically permitted by this Rulebook, it is prohibited. All model, engine, or equipment changes or modifications not specifically addressed in this Rulebook must be submitted in writing to NHRA for consideration prior to competition…”

The Elite Motorsports team had a conversation with an NHRA Official regarding this topic during the Epping event, and this rule was communicated to them at that time. By choosing to use these wheels and tires in Bristol, they demonstrated a willful disregard for the instruction given by NHRA.”

Based on that, I think that there’s no room for interpretation. This was clearly an attempt from a struggling team to get a competitive advantage using an illegal strategy. It’s been no secret that Elite Motorsports has been struggling for some time. It’s no secret that they are frustrated, and want to turn things around. But did they really think they would get away with it?

Seriously, do cheating teams thing that sanctioning bodies are that dumb that they could run blatantly illegal equipment and not get caught? It rarely works, and there are serious consequences. The loss of points has effectively ended her playoff hopes. Her season is over. Even if the team appeal the penalty, it’s unlikely she will win. It’s not like these wheels are in the gray area. They are outright banned. Teams and drivers know good and well what equipment is legal and what equipment is illegal. Erica is screwed, she knows it, and she can’t blame anyone but herself.

Next we move on to Formula 1. The 2026 Formula 1 schedule came out, and a stunning change was made. To quote the Formula 1 website:

“The calendar sees further improvements to the geographical flow of races, including the Canadian Grand Prix now following Miami in an earlier slot from May 22-24, delivering significant freight efficiencies as some equipment can move directly from one event to the other.

This change creates a consolidated European leg of the season across the summer months, beginning in Monaco from June 5-7 and finishing in Spain, where Madrid will make its F1 calendar debut from September 11-13.”

As Adam Stern phrased it:

“Person familiar with @F1’s thinking disputed the characterization that the Canada switch was made to encroach on the Indy 500, adding that F1 respects Indy but had to better regionalize its schedule and factor in the wishes of the @F1GPCanada promoters.”

Well, here’s the problem. Regardless of intention, F1 is running opposition to the Indy 500. While the Monaco/Indy/Charlotte system worked well for years, and got everybody good TV numbers, this new setup will cost F1 a lot of live viewers. NASCAR, which does three to four times the viewership that IndyCar does, won’t try to run opposition, since they understand the significance of the Indy 500 in North America.

The only time a nationally televised race tried to compete with the Indy 500 was the 1996 US 500, which was CART desperately trying to prove they were just as good as the Indy Racing League. It was such a disaster, CART never tried to compete with the Indy 500 again. It says a lot that, in 1996, the US 500 couldn’t get a broadcast tv deal, or a title sponsor.

If Formula 1 thinks they are going to win this battle, they are dead wrong. Formula 1 barely has the foothold in America to tie NASCAR, even with the move to Amazon Prime. If they honestly think they are going to put a dent in the Indy 500 viewership, they have another guess coming. The Indy 500 is too important to the American racing scene for the Canadian Grand Prix to put a dent in the ratings.

Why would F1, which is desperate for a foothold in the American market try this is mind boggling. This won’t work, and even with a broadcast on ABC, they won’t put a dent in the Indy 500 ratings. I know I sound like a broken record, but it just won’t happen. It won’t work, so please don’t try.

Sources Cited:

My Thoughts On Kyle Larson and The Double

By David G. Firestone

Just a brief column this week, since I have other things to focus on. So I’ve been holding back on this one for a bit, but I’ve been wanting to talk about this for some time. For the last two seasons, Kyle Larson has attempted to run The Double, both the Indy 500 and the Coca Cola 600 on the same day. This has been tried by a number of drivers, with varying degrees of success. But the question that needs to be asked is: Is it a good idea to run The Double?

Simple question, simple answer, no. No it is not a good idea to run the double. Racing drivers are built different than the rest of us, that’s never been up to debate. But there are personal glass ceilings for everyone, and the human body has its limits. Even the best and most in-shape drivers shouldn’t be allowed to run 1,100 miles of racing over the course of 8 hours and over 200 MPH. No matter how good you think you are, the after-effects of that amount of physical exertion will catch up with you eventually.

My other issue with the idea of running The Double is that Kyle is fighting for a championship in The Cup Series. Even with multiple wins on the season, a wreck can do a lot of damage for a championship hunt. Even a playoff waiver can’t undo the damage that a wreck can do to the human body. If he was a part timer, that might be one thing, since he could take some time to recover afterwards. But he had go back to the track the next weekend.

As a driver, your safety should be your number one priority. Pushing yourself beyond your toughest limits, while admirable, could see the end of your career. No matter how safe you think your car is, there is always something that can go wrong. No matter how good you think you are, you are just as human, and just as mortal, as anyone else.

I want Kyle to have a long and prosperous career. I want him to succeed, but I think he really needs to give up on The Double if he wants a good career.

The Team Penske Situation

By David G. Firestone

During practice for the Indy 500, two Team Penske cars were busted for technical violation. This, in turn, led to the firing of Tim Cindric, IndyCar managing director Ron Ruzewski, and IndyCar general manager Kyle Moyer. Tim Cindric was the highest member of the team to be fired. According to Wikipedia:

“Tim Cindric served as the Team Manager for Team Rahal from 1994 to 1999, before joining Penske in October 1999. He was promoted to the position of president at Penske Racing in January 2006. He also serves as strategist for the Penske-owned IndyCar teams of Will Power (through 2016) and Josef Newgarden (from 2017). His teams won the IndyCar championship for the 2014, 2017 and 2019 seasons. He departed the team in May 2025, three days after Will Power and Josef Newgarden’s cars failed technical inspection for having a modified part during the Firestone Fast 12 in qualifying for the 2025 Indianapolis 500.”

The reason for the firing was the modification of a rear attenuator. What is a rear attenuator, I hear you ask, well, let’s look at a well-written article on Motorsport.com by Bozi Tatarevic.

“In order to understand what transpired at Team Penske, we need to start with the function of the rear attenuator on an IndyCar. This rectangular piece sits at the back of the car and is attached to the gearbox where it serves two basic roles. Its primary role is to absorb impact in a crash and reduce the g-forces felt by the driver. It also serves as the mount for the rain light assembly.

According to multiple sources that aren’t authorized to speak publicly, Team Penske started receiving these updated attenuators back from Dallara in early 2024 and members of leadership were not pleased with the aesthetics of the new glued-on panels as they showed a bright glue line that stood out and with a large raised edge. A member of the technical leadership is rumored to have instructed members of their team to “clean up” the edges on the pieces in order to make the bright glue stand out less so these technicians applied a dark compound to the edges and smoothed them out.

Once these attenuators were modified, they were cleaned up and coated with sealer – per the standard procedure for many carbon fiber parts at Penske – and placed into their parts rotation to be installed on the cars to start the 2024 season.”

This whole situation is amazing, since, realistically, it didn’t provide any on-track advantage at all, and was just for aesthetic purposes. Many fans are complaining that IndyCar overreacted to the violation. Realistically, there could be other reasons for the firings.

It’s not out of the realm of possibility that were other things that were brewing in Team Penske. Looking at the standings, it’s clear Team Penske isn’t where they need to be, in terms of on track performance. I’m willing to bet that Roger Penske saw the opportunity to clean house, which isn’t a bad thing. Sometimes you have to take what isn’t working, throw it out, and try something new.

But this brings me back to something that’s not talked about as much. The fact that the owner of IndyCar also owns a team in IndyCar is a massive conflict of interest. Say what you want, but if the NFL, NBA, NHL, or MLB owned one of the teams while the rest were owned by outsiders, wouldn’t that be a conflict of interest?

The fact is that Roger Penske does not look good here at all. He may have fired three of his top guys, but that still doesn’t make him innocent in all of this. If you are the owner of a business, and your subordinates make a mistake, even if you weren’t at said business, it’s still on you. Nobody blames the janitor when the company goes bankrupt. Nobody blames the guy in the mailroom when a major industrial accident happens. The top brass gets the blame.

Roger needs to sell Team Penske if he is going to own IndyCar. It’s just that simple. Even if he his not involved, his name is still on the team. He will still be blamed for everything, regardless of personal involvement. Any boss who claims that he isn’t responsible for his subordinate’s actions needs to be replaced anyway.

In addition, the conflict of interest will only make things worse. If the owner of the league’s team gets busted again, or suddenly starts seeing success without explanation, wouldn’t that look suspicious? Roger Penske has given his critics all the rope they will ever need to hang him with, and they will hang him at some point, it’s just a matter of time. This will not end well at all.

Sources Cited:

Some Thoughts On Recent WWE Releases

By David G. Firestone

So I was going to devote this week’s column to the Team Penske IndyCar cheating situation, but I have a lot more to say than I thought I would, so I will save that for at least next week. I’ve been sitting on this for some time, and I want to discuss this. As is typical in the period after Wrestlemania, WWE has released a number of wrestlers.

Those who were released include main roster members Braun Strowman, Shayna Baszler, Dakota Kai, Kayden Carter,and Katana Chance. On the NXT/developmental side, those released were Cora Jade, Gigi Dolin, Joe Coffey, Mark Coffey, Wolfgang, Eddy Thorpe, Riley Osborne, Oro Mensah, Jakara Jackson, Javier Bernal, and Dani Palmer.

Whenever these releases happen, fans cry and crow for a while, and claim that WWE shouldn’t release talent. To that, I say, yes they should. First off, WWE is a for-profit company, and profits are key. It should also be noted that, after the last few years, WWE and TKO had a lot of debt, and costs involved in the merger, so the “profit” isn’t as great as it was.

Why is this an issue? Well, let’s do some math. There were a total of 17 performers released. If we assume they were all making the $250,000 minimum, this comes to a total of $4,250,000 that is directly saved by releasing these performers. It should be noted that some talent, including Braun Strowman, and Shayna Baszler were making much more than the minimum.

But there is a second reason these cuts are needed. WWE is the top echelon of professional wrestling. There is nothing higher. There are a lot of wrestlers in other promotions, or on the indies, who would love to be in WWE, and many of them have the talent to make it to WWE. When you are in the top echelon of anything, sports, business, or otherwise, there is the need to perform at the highest level.

This brings me to a concept I call the “personal glass ceiling.” The idea of a personal glass ceiling is that everybody has a point that they reach, where no matter what, they can’t go any higher. There are opportunities above them, but their personal limits prevent them from reaching new heights. This affects everybody, regardless of gender, race, religion, or ability. Even if you are fortunate enough to get to the top echelon, your career can and will be limited by your own limitations.

Don’t misunderstand me, I’m not knocking, or disrespecting any of the released wrestlers, far from it. They all had the skill, talent, and ability to perform at the top echelon of professional wrestling. 99.999999% of us can’t do what they did. That should be applauded. But when there are a lot of hungry mouths, and only a few spots at the top table, sometimes, it won’t work out.

Professional wrestling, like any other occupation is constantly changing, and constantly evolving. What worked yesterday, might nor work today..What works today, might not work tomorrow. For some, their time at the top table was brief, but for others it was much longer. Changing times call for changing rosters. It’s like that in every job. I’ve worked at the same job since 2007, and I can say that the job does evolve, and it does change. If it changes to the point I am no longer needed, I can and will be sent packing. That’s just a fact of life.

In the end, every single person at a job has a personal glass ceiling. Every single person at a job also has an expiration date, and for many of us, it’s out of our control. My advice is not to worry over things you can’t control. It doesn’t do anybody any good.

Starbucks and Stupidity

By David G. Firestone

As anyone who knows me will attest, I hate coffee. I haven’t had a cup since 2006. As such, I don’t go to Starbucks. Well, last week, after I wrote my column for the week, I came across an article on Starbucks. Specifically, how a number of Gen Z baristas are up in arms over the new dress policy. What specifically is the issue? well, according to the chain itself:

“That’s why, starting May 12, we’re evolving our dress code in all stores to focus on simplified color options that allow our iconic green apron to shine and create a sense of familiarity for our customers, no matter which store they visit across North America.

The more defined color palette includes any solid black short and long-sleeved crewneck, collared, or button-up shirts and any shade of khaki, black, or blue denim bottoms. We’re also making a new line of company branded t-shirts available to partners, who will receive two at no cost – including partner network options.”

Yes, you read that correctly. The Starbucks union employees are up in arms over the fact that the chain is mandadting them wearing a black polo shirt. As dumb as that may sound, here is a snippet from the New York Post article:

“In a video posted to X, Starbucks union workers in Seattle can be seen marching on management in response to the new dress code.

The clip was captioned, “Starbucks workers across the country are facing understaffing, inaccessible benefits, discrimination, and low wages.

“Instead of fixing these issues, Starbucks decided to introduce an unpopular, more conservative dress code.”

A barista wearing a bandana and a party hat can be seen addressing management, saying, “I don’t understand how [the dress code] is in good faith of letting us express ourselves.”

Another worker then says, “We’re just expected to lie down and accept it,” as union members clap and cheer.”

To those who think that this policy is unfair, let me add my own take. Young people have a tendency to be dumb, but this new crop, holy shit!

I’ve worked a number of different jobs in various fields over the years. Every single one of them had a dress code which outlined what I could and couldn’t wear. Sometimes the rules were for aesthetic reasons, khakis and polo to look professional, and sometimes they were for safety reasons, no loose clothes near machinery. Rules are rules, and you have to follow them, even if you think they are unfair.

It’s called being an adult. You’re going to have to grow up at some point. When you get hired to work anywhere, you work for the company, but the company does NOT have to work for you! You WILL spend a lot of time being unhappy, and life will be unfair against you, more often than not. Grown up adults can accept it, but these adult children can’t.

On the Fark.com comment section, one comment, made by

DeathByGeekSquad has a very apt take on Starbucks employees:

“There are three types of people who work at Starbucks stores.

“1. The manager – the person who is or wants to manage a store for the sake of padding their resume for a few years.

2. The paycheck earner – the person who is there while they figure things out but generally just cashing their check

3. The complacent – the people who want to do as little as possible to earn just enough to cover basics and complain about their life. They’re not out looking for better jobs, or looking to do anything that improves their chances of better employment.

The first two don’t care about dress code requirements, it’s part of the job. The third complains about everything, and therefore complains about dress code. They’ll also complain about Partner Services. The Playbook. The hours. The manager. The Assistant Store Manager. The customers. The menu. Their coworkers.

They’re a toxic presence at an otherwise smooth operation.

They’re made up of the dropouts, the people who are too stupid to become an ASM or Shift Manager, or semi-functional addicts looking for a payday.”

Starbucks isn’t a high-end cafe in a rich part of town. Starbucks isn’t a highly praised local or regional coffe house. Starbucks is pretty much the McDonald’s of coffee chains. People don’t visit Starbucks because of what the barista is wearing. You are there to make coffee, not put on a fashion show. Wearing a polo as part of your employment isn’t “fascism,” it isn’t “repression,” it isn’t “censorship.” It is, at best, a minor inconvenience.

Anybody who feels that their anger is justified is also part of the problem, in my eyes at least. Rather than just accept that rules are rules, and that life is unfair, they just can’t accept it, even though they are adults. Again, I’ve worked in many different jobs, in different fields, and all of them have had very specific dress codes. I had them in elementary, middle, and high school. College was more relaxed, but there were still rules. Just go to Amazon, and buy some cheap polo shirts. It’s not the end of the world, and it really doesn’t warrant union intervention.

I’m not a big corporations suck-up, but I do NOT have any sympathy for grown-up children who have no clue whatsoever how to be adults. Adults can handle dress codes and can abide by them, with no issues whatsoever. Grown-up children don’t like being told what to do, and will cry over the most meaningless issues. Sadly, the grown-up children will never learn, and these issues will come back again. Seriously, life is unfair, just accept it!

Sources Cited:

My Thoughts On Shedeur Sanders

By David G. Firestone

I’m not the biggest NFL fan, and I don’t watch college sports at all. But the biggest story of the NFL Draft was Shedeur Sanders. Shedeur Sanders, is the son of legendary NFL Hall of Famer Deion Sanders. Coming out of Colorado, many people thought his on-field talent would make him a first-round draft pick, but he got drafted in the fifth round. For some people, this was “racist,” for some, this was perplexing.

But for me, this was another case of a kid with too big of an ego for his own good. Many of the more level-headed people pointed out that the average Joe Schmo is not a talent scout. But I think Albert Breer’s take on Shedeur Sanders is very abt. This is from “NFL Draft Takeaways: An Honest Discussion About Shedeur Sanders,” on SI.com link at the . Here are some key points:

“This starts with teams’ evaluations of Sanders as a player. The story we had on Tuesday on the quarterback class as a whole covered it. If you read that, you know it wasn’t easy to find coaches or scouts who viewed the Colorado quarterback as a first-round talent coming into the draft. He’s not a great athlete. He didn’t show great arm talent. He had bad habits in taking unnecessary sacks and bailing out of the back of the pocket. He had trouble playing on time in general and did things off-schedule that weren’t going to translate to the NFL.

A lot of times in combine meetings, teams will have a player’s worst plays ready for him when he enters the room and, along those lines, one had a particularly rough interception teed up for Sanders in Indianapolis. When asked to explain it, Sanders didn’t take blame. And as they dove deeper into it, and how it might relate to the NFL level, Sanders simply concluded that maybe he and the staff he was talking to might not be a match.

Ahead of another visit, he got an install with mistakes intentionally planted in it—done to see if a quarterback would catch them. Sanders didn’t catch them. A coach called him on it, and the resulting exchange wasn’t pretty.

Instead, in this case, a lot of teams either had a tough experience with Sanders or didn’t have an experience with him at all. Which made it tough to spend a pick on him, because if you were looking for a developmental quarterback who’d be content to slide into the shadows and work at his craft, this didn’t seem like the guy.”

This is another example of a point I’ve been making over the years. It’s simply impossible to judge anything solely on how successful it is. Too many athletes, musicians, actors, politicians, and celebrities are finding out that if you give anybody the rope they need, they will hang you with it. Shedeur Sanders is no exception.

Professional sports is full of athletes with big egos, that’s to be expected. Sometimes though, an athlete’s ego is too big for his own good. That’s the problem with Shedeur Sanders. Based on everything I’ve seen so far, he clearly thinks he is 1000% more important than he really is. If he was as egotistical as he is, but was as talented as Tom Brady, he’d would have been a first-round pick. His talent didn’t equal his ego, and now he’s a developmental player for the Cleveland Browns.

But there’s another issue at play here. Specifically, the NFL Combine, and the various meetings. If Shedeur Sanders had any common sense, he’d understand that the NFL Combine is the football equivalent of the first part of a job interview. A huge lesson I learned in middle school about job interviews is that the best thing you can do is to convince the company hiring you that you don’t make bad decisions. Shedeur Sanders never got that lesson. Read the quotes I posted again. It’s clear that he didn’t really understand the significance of the meetings, and if he did, he didn’t care.

Say whatever you want about Deion Sanders’ ego, but you can’t argue he didn’t back it up. Hell, Deion Sanders was the first and only player to both play in both a Super Bowl and World Series, but who also WON both a Super Bowl, and World Series. While it’s also clear that Shedeur Sanders has the ego of Deion, but not the on-field talent of Deion.

Here’s the bottom line: It’s clear from everything that Shedeur Sanders wasn’t meant to be a first-round pick, and that he needs work on his game, and work on his ego. While he still has hope for making it in the NFL, it’s going to be a long road, and he’s going to need a lot of humility, which, I don’t think is going to happen, at least not very easily. He can prove everyone wrong, but does he really have the work ethic to do so? Time will tell.

Sources Cited:

A Brief Note This Week…

By David G. Firestone

Just a brief update for this week. So, due to reasons that were beyond my control, I didn’t upload anything the week before Easter. This was due to a series of personal and family issues. While I’d like to say that everything is back to normal, sadly, this is the new normal for me and my family. As such, due to theses personal issues, it’s less than clear where The Driver Suit Blog will go from here.

What I can say is for the time being, I will try and regularly upload and post, but real life can and will get in the way. If I’m not able to post as much as I previously had, that’s why. I’m not giving up on The Driver Suit Blog, at least not yet. That’s really all I have for this week.

It’s So Satisfying When Bad Things Happen To Bad People

By David G. Firestone

Sometimes in life, luck is on our side. Sometimes luck is against us. We all hate seeing bad things happen to good people, and we all hate seeing good things happen to bad people. On the other hand, it’s always satisfying when good things happen to good people, and when bad things happen to bad people. Today, we focus on the latter.

Johnny Somali, real name Ramsey Khalid Ismael, is an IRL streamer, who claims he is an internet troll. His MO is to travel to other countries to piss off as many people as possible, by being racist and ignorant. He is basically the kid who would eat paste for a nickel, only he annoys citizens of the country he is in for a $5 donation. He’s been banned from most streaming platforms, including Kick. Do you know how much of a douche you have to be to get kicked off of Kick?

In his travels, he traveled to Japan in 2023, and promptly proceeded to make an ass out of himself. He frequently made references to the atomic bombings, made numerous racist statements, got beaten up, and was arrested. He went to Israel, and conduted himself in much the same way. In both cases, he was arrested, and deported. At this point, he felt himself to be invincible. But he forgot one thing. Karma has a unique way of showing up at the worst possible time.

Johnny Somali’s downfall began on September 27, 2024, when he traveled to Seoul, South Korea. He acted the same way he did in Japan and Israel, only this time, he overlooked one critical detail. South Korea isn’t as tolerant of these issues as other countries. Currently, he is on probation, and is prevented from leaving the country. He is facing five charges, and was set to attend court on March 7, 2025.

In this situation, where you are facing serious charges, I would take this as seriously as possible, and be on my best behavior. Not Johnny Somali. Somali showed up to court over an hour late, was incredibly hungover due to a “shots for donations” livestream, and wore a MAGA hat. Court officials told Somali to take the hat off, but he kept putting it back on. During the hearing, it became clear he wasn’t getting another slap on the wrist. Each of the five charges carries the potential of five years in prison. He’s going to trial next month, and I’m looking forward to it.

Johnny Somali has proven himself to be a clown, a troll, and a moron. He’s a trash streamer, who will do anything for a $5 donation. He has never been put in check and all, until this most recent incident. Now, he’s going to prison, hopefully for a long time. Sadly, there are a lot of Johnny Somali style streamers, and we need to send a message to them, that we won’t tolerate this behavior at all.

Now we move on to our second story. Hulk Hogan’s ex-wife Linda Hogan went on an unhinged rant on her family life. She talked about her hatred for Hulk, and blamed him for their daughter Brooke not being a part of her life. It’s such an amazing rant that I can’t really do it justice. But let’s dive a little deeper into Linda Hogan.

Hulk and Linda were married in 1983 and divorced in 2009. During the divorce, Linda dated a man 29 years younger than she was. She took Hulk to the cleaners in the divorce. In terms of personality, she is just as bad as Hulk. She’s just as selfish and narcissistic as Hulk. She is an awful person, and is undeserving of mercy.

Linda’s rant drew the attention of Brooke Hogan, now married with two kids. I’m going to post some of her response here.

“There was a recent video posted by my mother that was concerning enough for people to send to me, making me feel the need to address the tip of a very large iceberg that is my immediate family. What little I am addressing does not even scratch the surface of what I’ve dealt with my entire life.

I will start by saying this video is mild compared to the behavior I have witnessed for the greater portion of my life. This also comes in addition to false claims that she has previously posted and then deleted. That being said, she has been through a lot of trauma and pain—my heart breaks for her. You can’t control how others treat you, but you can control how you treat others and how you cope with things.

Too many times, I have ignored things said about me and haven’t spoken my truths. Even so, I will keep things as vague as possible to continue to protect people… people who should have protected me.

Most importantly, I have completely separate reasons for going no contact with each of my parents. No contact with my mom has nothing to do with my dad, and no contact with my father has nothing to do with my mother. This also pertains to my dad’s second and third, now current, wife. This decision was made based purely on how they have each dealt with me directly my entire life.

I have been EXTREMELY verbally and mentally abused since childhood. Sadly, it would frequently turn physical. And sometimes, it’s not by the person you would assume—abuse comes in all shapes and sizes. This vicious pattern has robbed me of any sense of self-esteem or confidence—I’ve been trained to pretend I have it.

Up until adulthood, I’ve received berating and vile text messages, verbal and public reamings with unbelievably hurtful words said to me that cannot be forgotten. I’ve been asked to defend poor behavior to the public and have done so out of love, only to find I was misinformed, manipulated, and lied to. Still, to this day, I face constant ridicule for the poor decisions of others.

I’ve watched others benefit financially off my suffering and embarrassment caused by their selfish behavior. While it caused my life to crumble, I continued to stay strong and silent.

I was expected to—and DID— forgive massive blows to my career and personal life, nasty behavior, omissions of truth, blatant lies, manipulation, and repetitive errors in hopes of renewing previous family bonds.

I’ve been used as a pawn, a buffer, and treated like I’m downright stupid, too. No child or human should ever experience something like this.

Feeling injustice, not speaking my truth, dealing with smear campaigns, flying monkeys, enablers of this behavior, watching fake win over what’s real, and losing other family members and friends in an attempt to stop gossip and ongoing drama is also a painful side effect of this decision I deal with daily.

I gave endless chances hoping for the best and was met with more disrespect. At a certain point, I had to stop setting myself on fire to keep others warm.

One day, my family will look back and see that I never exposed the full truth. I was a waitress making $2.13 an hour to build a business of my own with no help from anyone. Nobody can take that away from me.

You can forgive people but still not allow them to mistreat you. I have nothing left to give to people who take, take, take, and never give in return. I choose peace. But my silence and my kindness should not be mistaken for weakness.

There are far more important things in this world. There are people out there trying to survive. And yet, there are families who have had all the opportunities in the world, and still choose to destroy each other.”

Based on everything I’ve seen, I fully believe Brooke’s side of things. She’s clearly hurt, she’s clearly avoiding the spotlight, and she is the most believable of the group. But what really strikes me here is that she did something that many people can’t, or won’t do…cut ties and run.

I am a big believer in cutting ties with people who are toxic. Many people in my life think I’m toxic, and have cut me out of their life. I’ve done the same with a lot of people. Brooke is smart enough to realize that Hulk and Linda were Superfund levels of toxic, and the only escape is to cut and run. She doesn’t want her kids to experience the same toxicity she had to endure. She is, without a doubt, the most mature and intelligent member of that family.

I don’t care who they are to you, I don’t care how much they may have meant to you, and I don’t care how much you may love them. Anybody who tries to tear you down for their own selfishness is toxic, and should be cut out of your life quickly. Don’t let them destroy you. I applaud Brooke, and I’m glad she’s in a good place now. She summed it up better. “At a certain point, I had to stop setting myself on fire to keep others warm.”

Sources Cited: